SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Kauran Nivas Katoch vs The State Of Maharashtra on 24 June, 2019

ABA451-19.doc

AnandINTHEHIGHCOURTOFJUDICATUREATBOMBAY
CRIMINALAPPELLATEJURISDICTION

ANTICIPATORYBAILAPPLICATIONNO.451OF2019

KauranNivasKatoch.Applicant

Vs.

TheStateofMaharashtra.Respondent

Dr.SamarthS.Karmarkari/b.Mr.RahulShelke,Advocate,for
theApplicant
Mrs.P.P.Shinde,APP,fortheRespondent-State

CORAM:REVATIMOHITEDERE,J.

DATE:24.06.2019
P.C.

.Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties.

2.BythisApplication,theApplicantseekspre-arrestbail

inconnectionwithC.R.No.I-124of2018registeredwiththe

KapurbawdiPoliceStation,Thane,fortheallegedoffences

punishableunderSections498A,406r/w34SectionoftheIndianPenal

Code.

3.Perusedthepapers.TheApplicantwasgrantedinterim

1of3

:::Uploadedon-26/06/201926/06/201922:29:42:::
ABA451-19.doc

protectionbythisCourt(Coram:PrakashD.Naik,J.)videorder

dated21.02.2019passedinABANo.451of2019.Themarriage

betweentheComplainant(daughter-in-lawoftheApplicant)and

thesonoftheApplicantwassolemnizedon12.12.2013.After

registrationoftheFIR,itappearsthattheComplainantinitiated

divorceproceedingsinaCourt,inUSA.Italsoappearsthatthe

Complainant’shusbandisresidinginUSA.Learnedcounselforthe

ApplicantsubmitsthattheCourtinUSAhasgrantedadecreeof

divorcetotheComplainantandtheApplicant’sson,on

17.12.2018.

4.Inthepeculiarfactsofthiscase,custodial

interrogationoftheApplicantisnotwarranted.Accordingly,the

ApplicationisallowedandtheApplicantisgrantedpre-arrestbail

onthefollowingtermsconditions:-

ORDER

(i)Intheeventofarrest,theApplicantbeenlargedon

bail,onexecutingP.R.BondinthesumofRs.25,000/-withone

ortwosuretiesinthelikeamount;

(ii)TheApplicantshallreporttotheinvestigatingofficer

2of3

:::Uploadedon-26/06/201926/06/201922:29:42:::
ABA451-19.doc

oftheconcernedpolicestationasandwhencalledforbythe

investigatingofficer;

(iii)TheApplicantshallnottamperwiththeevidenceor

attempttoinfluenceorcontactthecomplainant,witnessesorany

personconcernedwiththecase.

5.TheApplicationisallowedintheaforesaidtermsand

isaccordinglydisposedof.

Allconcernedtoactontheauthenticatedcopyofthis

order.

(REVATIMOHITEDERE,J.)

3of3

:::Uploadedon-26/06/201926/06/201922:29:42:::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation