1
44.
13.01.2020
F.B.
Ct. No. 33.
C.R.R. 76 of 2020
Kiran Binani Anr.
Vs.
The State of West Bengal Anr.
Mr. Avik Ghatak,
Mr. Salman Hasan
….. For the Petitioners.
Mr. Saibal Dasgupta,
Mr. Md. Apzal Ansari
….. For the Defacto complainant.
Learned advocate on record is given liberty to correct
the cause title of the present revisional application.
The petitioners have approached before this Court by
way of filing an application under Section 482 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure praying for quashing of the proceedings of
G.R. Case No. 1078 of 2018 arising out of Tangra Police
Station Case No. 98 of 2018 dated April 24, 2018 under
Sections 498A/406/313/34 of the Indian Penal Code and
under Sections 3/ 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
2
From the submissions made by learned counsel
appearing for the petitioners, it appears that initially the case
was started for commission of the alleged offences punishable
under Sections 498A/406/313/34 of the Indian Penal Code
and under Sections 3/ 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
Thereafter, charge sheet was submitted against the present
petitioner along with others for commission of the alleged
offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of the
Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3/ 4 of the Dowry
Prohibition Act.
Having regard to the submissions made by learned
counsel appearing for the petitioners and considering the
materials placed on record, the petitioners are directed to
serve the copies of the present application along with all
annexed documents to the opposite party no. 1/the State of
West Bengal through the office of the learned Public
Prosecutor and to the opposite party no. 2 by speed post with
acknowledgement due within one week from date and to file
affidavit-of-service within two weeks thereafter.
Let the matter appear in the list under the same
heading “Listed Motion” two weeks hence.
3
Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied
for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all necessary
formalities.
( Madhumati Mitra,
J. )
