SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Kiran Binani & Anr vs The State Of West Bengal & Anr on 13 January, 2020

1

44.
13.01.2020

F.B.

Ct. No. 33.

C.R.R. 76 of 2020

Kiran Binani Anr.

Vs.

The State of West Bengal Anr.

Mr. Avik Ghatak,
Mr. Salman Hasan
….. For the Petitioners.

Mr. Saibal Dasgupta,
Mr. Md. Apzal Ansari
….. For the Defacto complainant.

Learned advocate on record is given liberty to correct

the cause title of the present revisional application.

The petitioners have approached before this Court by

way of filing an application under Section 482 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure praying for quashing of the proceedings of

G.R. Case No. 1078 of 2018 arising out of Tangra Police

Station Case No. 98 of 2018 dated April 24, 2018 under

Sections 498A/406/313/34 of the Indian Penal Code and

under Sections 3/ 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
2

From the submissions made by learned counsel

appearing for the petitioners, it appears that initially the case

was started for commission of the alleged offences punishable

under Sections 498A/406/313/34 of the Indian Penal Code

and under Sections 3/ 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Thereafter, charge sheet was submitted against the present

petitioner along with others for commission of the alleged

offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of the

Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3/ 4 of the Dowry

Prohibition Act.

Having regard to the submissions made by learned

counsel appearing for the petitioners and considering the

materials placed on record, the petitioners are directed to

serve the copies of the present application along with all

annexed documents to the opposite party no. 1/the State of

West Bengal through the office of the learned Public

Prosecutor and to the opposite party no. 2 by speed post with

acknowledgement due within one week from date and to file

affidavit-of-service within two weeks thereafter.

Let the matter appear in the list under the same

heading “Listed Motion” two weeks hence.
3

Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied

for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all necessary

formalities.

( Madhumati Mitra,

J. )

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation