HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 4172 / 2018
1. Krishan Kumar S/o Sh. Vajaram, aged about 35 years, by
Caste Joshi, R/o Ajodar.
2. Sanjay Kumar S/o Sh. Dalpat, aged about 34 years, by Caste
Joshi, R/o Kanwada, Tehsil Raniwada, District Jalore (Raj.)
State of Rajasthan
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kirti Kumar Joshi, brother of the
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arjun Singh Rathore, Public Prosecutor
JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR, VACATION JUDGE
This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the
petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with F.I.R.
No.50/2018, Police Station Raniwada, District Jalore for the
Since the lawyers are abstaining from work, heard Mr. Kirti
Kumar Joshi, brother of the petitioner and the learned Public
Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the present
petitioners are not connected with the crime and the offence
alleged. The complainant has preferred a complaint before the
Police Station Raniwada being No.50/2018 in which the husband of
Priyanka namely Kirti Kumar was arrested who is co-accused and
(2 of 2)
has already been granted bail and no overt act is said to have
been committed by the present petitioners, therefore, they may
be enlarged on bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and
upon a consideration of the arguments advanced, this Court is of
the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the
petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed
that in the event of arrest of petitioners (1) Krishan Kumar S/o
Sh. Vajaram and (2) Sanjay Kumar S/o Sh. Dalpat, in connection
with F.I.R. No.50/2018, Police Station Raniwada, District Jalore,
the petitioners shall be released on bail; provided each of them
furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- along with
two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the
concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following
(i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for
interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
(ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with
the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing
such facts to the court or any police officer; and
(iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous
permission of the court.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR), V.J.