SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Krishna Ghanshyam Lohia And Ors vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 7 September, 2018

sr.919.aba.1833.2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1833 OF 2018

Krishna Ghanshyam Lohia and anr. …Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and anr. …Respondents

Mr.Subhash Jha a/w. Ms. Sajana Pardeshi i/b. Law Global for the
applicants.
Mr.Arfan Sait, APP for the respondent/State.
Ms.Megha Patil, PSI, Juhu Police Station, Mumbai.

CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATE : 7th SEPTEMBER 2018
P.C. :

1. The applicants had earlier apprehended arrest in relation to

complaints made by wife of applicant no.1 at Pune and preferred an

application for anticipatory bail before this Court which was disposed

of vide order dated 30th August, 2018. The Court recorded statement

made by the APP that as on that date no crime was registered against

the applicants and the applicants will not be arrested without 72

hours prior written intimation.

Vina k 1/2
sr.919.aba.1833.2018

2. Apparently the complaint has been presently referred to Juhu
Police Station and the learned APP on instructions submits that the
complaint has been received only yesterday and enquiry is in
progress.

3. In the circumstance, it appears that the First Information
Report has not yet been registered but the complaint alleging offence
punishable under Sections 498A, 504, 506, 323, 420, 406 of the
Indian Penal Code has been received. In this circumstance,
protection granted by this Court vide order dated 30 th August, 2018
in Criminal Anticipatory Bail Application No.1678 of 2018 can be
granted to the applicants.

:: ORDER ::

(i) In the event, the respondents decide to arrest the applicants
or summon them for the purpose of investigation, 72 hours
advance written notice before effecting arrest be given to
the applicants.

(ii) In the event such notice is received the applicants will be at
liberty to seek appropriate remedy before competent Court.

Digitally

(iii) Criminal Anticipatory Bail Application stands disposed of.

signed by
Vina Vina Arvind
Khadpe
Arvind Date:
Khadpe 2018.09.10
16:36:00
[PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.]
+0530

Vina k 2/2

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation