SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Kumkum Yadav @ Radhika vs State on 4 February, 2020

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 470/2020

Kumkum Yadav @ Radhika W/o Manmohan Yadav D/o Shri
Gajendra Singh Yadav, Aged About 25 Years, By Caste Yadav,
R/o 41, Sindhi Vinayak 4, Jhalamand, Jodhpur, District Jodhpur
Metro.

—-Petitioner
Versus

1. State, Through P.p.

2. Inspector General Of Police, Jodhpur Range, Jodhpur.

3. Commissioner Of Police, Jodhpur Range, Jodhpur.

4. Sho Of Women Police Station, Jodhpur City West, District
Jodhpur.

—-Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr.L.K.Ramdhari
For Respondent(s) : Mr.Mahipal Bishnoi, P.P.

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA

Judgment / Order

04/02/2020

Heard learned counsel the petitioner and the learned

P.P. Perused the material on record.

The instant miscellaneous petition has been filed by the

petitioner seeking direction for conducting fair investigation in

F.I.R. No.14/2020 registered at Woman Police Station Jodhpur City

West, District Jodhpur Metro.

The petitioner filed an F.I.R. No. 14/2020 at the Woman

Police Station Jodhpur City West, District Jodhpur Metro against

the accused person named in the F.I.R. for the offences under

Sections 498A, 406 and 323 I.P.C. According to the learned

counsel for the petitioner, the police authorities have not taken

(Downloaded on 05/02/2020 at 08:35:41 PM)
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-470/2020]

any action against the accused person and thus appropriate

direction be given for fair investigation of the F.I.R.

This Court is of the opinion that in view of the observations

made and directions given by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case

of Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P., AIR 2008 SC 907, no person

can be encouraged to directly approach this Court for seeking

direction of fair investigation. If any person is aggrieved of lack of

action by the police as regards the FIR which has been filed

by/against him/her, the appropriate course of action for the

aggrieved person is to first approach the Magistrate having

jurisdiction, who can call for the report from the investigating

officer and also instruct the investigating officer to investigate the

matter fairly. If the petitioner is aggrieved by any inaction of the

police, then he should move to the appropriate Court in

accordance with the directions issued by the Apex Court in the

aforesaid judgment. The trial court would be empowered to call for

the report from the I.O. and issue appropriate direction for fair

investigation in consonance with the view expressed by the

Hon’ble Apex Court.

With the aforesaid observations, the miscellaneous petition

and the stay petition are disposed of.

(SANDEEP MEHTA),J

/tarun goyal/ 115

(Downloaded on 05/02/2020 at 08:35:41 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation