SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Kundan Shrivastava @ Kundan Kumar … vs The State Of Bihar on 12 October, 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.63096 of 2018
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2 Year- 2018 Thana -RAM PUR District- GAYA

KUNDAN SHRIVASTAVA @ KUNDAN KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA @
KUNDAN KUMAR S/o Kamlesh Prasad alias Rajesh Srivastava alias
Rajesh Kumar Shrivastava, R/o Village -Gangya,P.S.-Ekma, Distt.-Chapra

…. …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar

…. …. Opposite Party

Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar Mishra
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA
ORAL ORDER

2 12-10-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make

necessary correction in the petition in the course of the day.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

The petitioner prays for bail in connection with Rampur

P.S.Case No. 02 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable

under Sections 420, 406 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of cheating the

informant and others by collecting total Rs.56 lakhs from each of

six candidates on the pretext of providing them job.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that

petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and there is no

chit of paper to show that petitioner has taken money from them

and petitioner is in custody since 1.7.2018. Further submission is

that no case is made out under Section 406 IPC as amount was

given for illegal purpose.

Patna High Court Cr.M isc. No.63096 of 2018 (2) dt.12-10-2018

2/2

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and in the facts and

circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail

on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VIII,

Gaya, in connection with Rampur P.S.Case No.02 of 2018, subject

to the condition that one of the bailors shall be a local person

having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of

court concerned.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)
spal/-

U T

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh