SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Lakhpati vs Rajesh on 9 August, 2018

223 CM-4542-CII-2017 CMM-37-2009 in FAO-M-62-2009


Present: Mr. Amit Prashar, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Munfaid Khan, Advocate, for
Mr. Amit Kumar Jain, Advocate, for the respondent.


Counsel for the respondent-husband submits that the respondent-

husband is not in contact with him since long.

The application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act has

been taken up for hearing as the same has been pending since 2009.

The appellant-wife claims that she has got no source of income

being a parda nashin lady whereas the respondent-husband is employed with

Bank of India besides having agricultural income and a house in village as well

as in city. His earning in the year 2009 is stated to be was Rs.10,000/- per

month and income from agricultural land was Rs.7000/- per month. The

appellant-wife claimed maintenance pendente lite at the rate of Rs.5000/- per

month for herself and Rs.3000/- for her minor son besides claiming

Rs.15,000/- as litigation expenses.

In the reply filed by the respondent-husband, it has been stated

that his income from salary as Peon in Bank of India is Rs.6828/- only. Other

avements have been denied.

Another miscellaneous application was filed by the appellant-wife

in the year 2017 placing on record additional affidavit of the appellant-wife in

which salary of the respondent-husband in the month of August, 2016 has been

mentioned as Rs.25,114/- per month.

We have considered the facts and circumstances of the case and

are of the opinion that the appellant-wife is entitled to maintenance pendente

1 of 2
12-08-2018 14:22:26 :::
CM-4542-CII-2017 CMM-37-2009 in FAO-M-62-2009 -2-

lite with effect from the date of application commensurate with the income of

the respondent-husband with effect from 2009.

No material has been placed before this Court to arrive at a

conclusion that the appellant herself is capable of earning or has any source of

income. She is shouldering the responsibility of looking after the minor child.

It has been informed that the appellant-wife and her son had been

granted maintenance pendente lite to the tune of Rs.1500/- and Rs.1000/- per

month respectively which was later on enhanced to Rs.8000/- per month.

Taking into consideration the income of the respondent-husband,

we are of the opinion that he is liable to pay maintenance pendente lite from

February, 2009 to December, 2015 at the rate of Rs.5000/- per month and with

effect from January, 2016, a sum of Rs.12,000/- per month along with

litigation expenses of Rs.30,000/-. It is made clear that any amount paid

towards the maintenance in proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C. would be

deductible from the amount awarded.

Application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act is

allowed in above terms.

For payment of the arrears of maintenance and litigation

expenses, adjourned to 19.11.2018.

It is made clear that in case the arrears are not cleared, adverse

legal consequences would follow against the respondent-husband.

The miscellaneous application (CM-4542-CII-2017) will be heard

with the main case.


harsha JUDGE

2 of 2
12-08-2018 14:22:26 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation