SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Lalita Devi vs State Of Rajasthan on 21 June, 2019

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 116/2019

Lalita Devi W/o Roshan Lal, Aged About 32 Years, B/c Saini, R/o
34 Rd Padampura Tehsil Suratgarh, District Sriganganagar.

—-Petitioner
Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Of Home
Affairs Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. Superintendent Of Police, Sriganganagar.

3. Station House Officer (Sho), Police Station Suratgarh,
Sahar, District Sriganganagar.

4. Mahendra Kumar S/o Mahaveer Prasad, B/c Saini, R/o
Khatiyon Ki Dhani, Chak 22 Ntr, Tehsil Nohar, District
Hanumangarh.

5. Gauri Shankar S/o Mahaveer, B/c Saini R/o Khatiyon Ki
Dhani, Chak 22 Ntr, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh.

6. Shyam Lal S/o Mahaveer, B/c Saini, R/o Johade Ke Paas,
Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh.

7. Dharampal S/o Mahaveer, B/c Saini, R/o Johade Ke Paas,
Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh.

—-Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.D.S.S. Kharlia
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Farzand Ali, G.A.-cum-A.A.G., with
Mr. Abhishek Purohit
Mr.H.S. Sidhu
Mr. Rameshwar Lal, S.I., Incharge
S.H.O., Police Station Suratgarh City,
District Sri Ganganagar

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

Order

21/06/2019

After arguing the matter at some length, Mr. Kharlia,

learned counsel representing the petitioner, craves liberty to

(Downloaded on 26/06/2019 at 11:41:20 PM)
(2 of 2) [HC-116/2019]

withdraw the instant habeas corpus petition seeking leave that the

petitioner may be allowed to file appropriate application for

seeking custody of her child in the competent family court and

that the family court may be directed to allow the petitioner to

meet her child and also to decide the proceedings expeditiously.

To this submission, Mr. Sidhu, appearing for the

respondent, does not have any objection.

In this background, we hereby permit the petitioner to

file an application for seeking custody of her minor child before

the competent family court under the Guardians and SectionWards Act

within next 15 days. Upon such application being filed, the family

court shall take the matter up expeditiously and decide the same

as per law within a period of six months from the date of filing of

the application. During the intervening period, suitable

opportunity shall be provided to the petitioner to meet her son.

The habeas corpus petition is disposed of as withdrawn

with the above direction.

(PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J (SANDEEP MEHTA),J

5-Pramod/-

(Downloaded on 26/06/2019 at 11:41:20 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation