SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Linoop.C.K vs State Of Kerala on 24 October, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS

THURSDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 / 2ND KARTHIKA, 1941

Bail Appl..No.4870 OF 2019

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CRMC 955/2019 DATED 01-06-2019 OF
DISTRICT COURT SESSIONS COURT,THALASSERY

CRIME NO.230/2019 OF Kolavallur Police Station , Kannur

PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

LINOOP.C.K.
AGED 27 YEARS
S/O.GOVINDAN,KUTTAKETTIL HOUSE,
THRIPPANGOTTUR AMSOM,
VILAKOTTUR.

BY ADVS.
SMT.BINDUMOL JOSEPH
SRI.B.S.SYAMANTHAK

RESPONDENT:

STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM-682031.

OTHER PRESENT:

SRI.AMJAD ALI, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
24.10.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Bail Appl..No.4870 OF 2019 2

ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
—————————————–
B.A. No. 4870 of 2019
—————————————–
Dated this the 24th day of October, 2019

ORDER

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in relation to his involvement as

the sole accused in the instant Crime No. 230/2019 of Kolavalloor Police

Station, Kannur District which has been registered for offences punishable

under Secs. 498A and 406 of the SectionIPC on the basis of the FI statement given

by the lady defacto complainant (petitioner’s wife) on 02.05.2019 at 5.30

pm in respect of the incident which happened for the period from

30.04.2018 to 20.12.2018.

2. The learned Prosecutor would now submit on the basis of the

instructions of the investigating agency that now the investigation has been

finalised and the final report/charge sheet has also been duly filed before

the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thalassery, where it is now pending as

calendar case C.C.No.698/2019. The learned Prosecutor further submit

that in view of these subsequent developments, the investigating agency

does not insist for the arrest of the petitioner for the investigation of the

abovesaid crime as the said investigation has already been finalised and so,

the apprehension raised by the petitioner that he could be arrested and

remanded on account of the pending investigation etc. is unfounded. In
Bail Appl..No.4870 OF 2019 3

the light of these aspects, it is for the petitioner to work out his remedies in

accordance with the law.

Accordingly, the above application will stand disposed of.

sd/-

ALEXANDER THOMAS,
JUDGE

SKS

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation