SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Lokendra Singh vs State Of Rajasthan on 23 July, 2021

Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2550/2021

Lokendra Singh S/o Shri Nathu Singh, Aged About 41 Years, R/o
E-220, Jai Narayan Vyas Colony, Bikaner.
—-Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2. Krishna Kanwar W/o Lokender Singh Rathore, B/c Rajput,
R/o Plot No 222, Gunjangarh House, Indra Colony
Jaisalmer.
—-Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Vikas Bijarnia.
For Respondent(s) : Mr.Gaurav Singh, PP.
Mr.Dilip Singh Sodha.

HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

Order

23/07/2021

1. In wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases,

abundant caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters

in Court, for the safety of all concerned.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel

for the respondent no.2/complainant jointly submit that the

petitioner and the complainant have entered into a compromise in

a matrimonial dispute. It is thus submitted that the parties are not

inclined to proceed further in the matter.

3. Learned counsel for the parties have placed reliance on

a decision of Supreme Court in case of Gian Singh V/s. State of

Punjab Anr. [(2012) 10 SCC 303].

(Downloaded on 23/07/2021 at 08:55:56 PM)
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-2550/2021]

4. Learned Public Prosecutor states that the compromise

has happened between the parties and the factum of such

compromise is also reflected in the factual report of the I.O.

furnished by the learned Public Prosecutor. The said factual report

is taken on record.

5. In view of the compromise arrived at between the

parties as well as the verification of factum thereof by the learned

Public Prosecutor on the strength of the aforementioned factual

report and applying the ratio in decision of Gian Singh Vs. State

of Punjab Anr. (supra), this Court deems it just and proper to

invoke its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

6. Accordingly, the present misc. petition is allowed and

the FIR No.105/2020 lodged at Police Station Mahila Jaisalmer,

District Jaisalmer for the offence under Sections 498A, 323 34 of

IPC, along with entire proceedings pursuant thereto qua the

petitioners are hereby quashed.

7. Stay petition also stands disposed of.

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.

158-SPhophaliya/Jitender/-

(Downloaded on 23/07/2021 at 08:55:56 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

Recent Comments

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2024 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation