SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

M/s. Imperia Structure Ltd. Vs. Brig. Harit Pant [28/03/2022]

Tweet

M/s. Imperia Structure Ltd. Vs. Brig. Harit Pant

[Civil Appeal No. 1816 of 2022]

This appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 11.10.2021 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (“the National Commission” for short) in Consumer Case No.1043 of 2018. The National Commission in paragraph 10 of its judgment relied upon the decision of this Court in Imperia Structures Ltd. v. Anil Patni Another, (2020) 10 SCC 783. Paragraph 25 of the decision in Imperia Structures Ltd. (supra) was as under:

“25. In terms of Section 18 of the RERA Act, if a promoter fails to complete or is unable to give possession of an apartment duly completed by the date specified in the agreement, the promoter would be liable, on demand, to return the amount received by him in respect of that apartment if the allottee wishes to withdraw from the Project. Such right of an allottee is specifically made “without prejudice to any other remedy available to him”.

The right so given to the allottee is unqualified and if availed, the money deposited by the allottee has to be refunded with interest at such rate as may be prescribed. The proviso to Section 18(1) contemplates a situation where the allottee does not intend to withdraw from the Project. In that case he is entitled to and must be paid interest for every month of delay till the handing over of the possession. It is up to the allottee to proceed either under Section 18(1) or under proviso to Section 18(1).

The case of Himanshu Giri came under the latter category. The RERA Act thus definitely provides a remedy to an allottee who wishes to withdraw from the Project or claim return on his investment.” Since the National Commission has followed the decision of this Court in Imperia Structures Ltd. (supra), we see no reason to entertain this appeal. The Civil Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs.

…………………………………………….J. (UDAY UMESH LALIT)

…………………………………………….J. (S. RAVINDRA BHAT)

…………………………………………….J. (PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA)

New Delhi;

March 28, 2022.

M/s. Imperia Structure Ltd. Vs. Baljor Singh Jakhar Etc.

[Civil Appeal Nos. 1899-1906 of 2022]

These appeals arise out of the judgment and order dated 11.10.2021 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (“the National Commission” for short) in Consumer Case Nos.1044 of 2018, 1045 of 2018, 1046 of 2018, 1047 of 2018, 1048 of 2018, 1190 of 2018, 1191 of 2018 and 2590 of 2018. The National Commission in paragraph 10 of its judgment relied upon the decision of this Court in Imperia Structures Ltd. v. Anil Patni Another, (2020) 10 SCC 783. Paragraph 25 of the decision in Imperia Structures Ltd. (supra) was as under:

“25. In terms of Section 18 of the RERA Act, if a promoter fails to complete or is unable to give possession of an apartment duly completed by the date specified in the agreement, the promoter would be liable, on demand, to return the amount received by him in respect of that apartment if the allottee wishes to withdraw from the Project. Such right of an allottee is specifically made “without prejudice to any other remedy available to him”.

The right so given to the allottee is unqualified and if availed, the money deposited by the allottee has to be refunded with interest at such rate as may be prescribed. The proviso to Section 18(1) contemplates a situation where the allottee does not intend to withdraw from the Project. In that case he is entitled to and must be paid interest for every month of delay till the handing over of the possession. It is up to the allottee to proceed either under Section 18(1) or under proviso to Section 18(1). The case of Himanshu Giri came under the latter category.

The RERA Act thus definitely provides a remedy to an allottee who wishes to withdraw from the Project or claim return on his investment.” Since the National Commission has followed the decision of this Court in Imperia Structures Ltd. (supra), we see no reason to entertain these appeals.

The Civil Appeals are, accordingly, dismissed. No Costs.

…………………………………………….J. (UDAY UMESH LALIT)

…………………………………………….J. (S. RAVINDRA BHAT)

…………………………………………….J. (PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA)

New Delhi;

March 28, 2022.

Item No.9

M/S. Imperia Structure Ltd. Vs. Brig. Harit Pant

[Civil Appeal No. 1816/2022]

[For Admission; and, IA No. 33573/2022 – for Stay) with C.A. Nos. 1899-1906/2022 (Xvii-A) (IA No.35552/2022 – For Exemption from Filing C/C of The Impugned Judgment; and IA No. 35551/2022 – for Stay)]

Date: 28-03-2022

These appeals were called on for hearing today.

CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA

For Appellant(s)
Ms. Pinaki Misra, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Pravin Bahadur, Adv.
Mr. Amit Agarwal, Adv.
Ms. Kanika Gomber, Adv.
Mr. Saurabh Kumar, Adv.
Mr. S. Anjani Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Navin Kumar Sehrawat, Adv.
Mr. Vishnu Kant, AOR

For Respondent(s)
Mr. Rahul Sharma, Adv.
Mr. S. Santanam Swaminadhan, Adv.
Ms. Abhilasha Shrawat, Adv.
Mr. Kartik Malhotra, Adv.
Mr. Prabhash Malik, Adv.
Ms. Aarthi Rajan, Adv.
Ms. Aarthi Rajan, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

ORDER

The Civil Appeals are dismissed, in terms of the separate Signed Orders placed on the file.

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

 Back

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

Recent Comments

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2024 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation