1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6442 OF 2015
BETWEEN:
1. MADHUSUDHAN S/O V B SWAMY
AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS
R/O NO.33/34, NEW RAJANNA LAYOUT
HORAMAVU AGARA, BANGALORE-560 043
2. V.B. SWAMY
S/O GANGADHARAPPA
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
R/O NO.33/34, NEW RAJANNA LAYOUT
HORAMAVU AGARA, BANGALORE-560 043
3. SMT MANJULA
W/O V B SWAMY
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
R/O NO.33/34, NEW RAJANNA LAYOUT
HORAMAVU AGARA, BANGALORE-560 043
… PETITIONERS
(BY SRI: R B DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY HENNUR POLICE STATION
BANGALORE CITY-560 001
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560001
2
2. CHANDANA
W/O MADHUSUDHAN,
AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS
R/AT NO.204, 1ST E CROSS, 3RD BLOCK
HRBR LAYOUT, KALYANANAGAR
BANGALORE CITY-560001
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI: I.S.PRAMOD CHANDRA, SPP-II FOR R1
SRI: RAJESH P., ADVOCATE FOR R2-ABSENT)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE
F.I.R. AND ITS CONSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS IN CRIME No.380/2014
OF HENNUR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU CITY PENDING ON THE
FILE OF XI ACMM COURT, MAYOHALL, BENGALURU CITY.
THIS CRL.P COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners is absent. Perused the
petition.
2. Petitioners have sought to quash the FIR in Crime
No.380/2014 of Hennur Police Station registered under section
498A read with 34 of Indian Penal Code, pending on the file of XI
Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore.
3
3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned
SPP-II appearing for respondent No.1 submits, after
investigation charge-sheet was filed and the same was
registered in C.C.No.56228/2015. After trial, petitioners were
acquitted of the above charges by judgment and order dated
23.01.2019 passed by XI Additional Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate, Bengaluru.
4. In view of the above submission, nothing survives
for consideration in this petition.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
In view of the dismissal of the petition, I.A.No.1/2015 does
not survive for consideration and it is also dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Bss
