SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Mahesh Bandyopadhyay vs Unknown on 20 February, 2019


147 20.02.2019

AB Court 28 C.R.M. 2109 of 2019
In Re : An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Goghat P.S.
Case No.29 of 2019 dated 27.1.2019 under Sections 498A/406
of the Indian Penal Code


In the matter of : Mahesh Bandyopadhyay


Mr. Atis Kr. Biswas,
Mr. Suman Chakraborty,
Mr. Amit Singh …for the Petitioner.

Mr. Anirban Banerjee …for the State.

Mr. P. Bhattacharya,
Mr. Asit Baran Ghosh,
Mr. Kaushik Biswas
Mr. Somesh Kr. Ghosh,
Mr. Dilip Sadhu …for the Defacto complainant.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has

been falsely implicated in the instant case due to matrimonial


Learned lawyer appearing for the State opposes the

prayer for anticipatory bail.

Learned lawyer appearing for the defacto complainant

submits that not only the defacto complainant but the special

child born to the couple had also been ill-treated.

Having considered the materials on record and bearing

in mind the nature of allegations, we are of the opinion though

custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be necessary,

he requires to cooperate with the investigation in accordance

with law.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the

petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of

Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties of

like amount each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and

also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further

condition that he shall meet the Investigating Officer once a

week until further orders.

The application for anticipatory bail is, accordingly,


Urgent Photostat Certified copy of this order, if applied

for, be supplied expeditiously after complying with all necessary

legal formalities.

(Manojit Mandal, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2022 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation