SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Mahesh S/O Ravindra Hattigudd vs The State Of Karnataka on 1 October, 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH

DATED THIS THE 1 S T DAY OF OCTOBER,2018

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL

CRIMINAL PETITION No.102386 OF 2017
BETWEEN:

1. MAHESH S/O RAVINDRA HATTIGUDD
AGE:34 YEARS, OCC:MARKETING
R/O HOUSE NO.86, 2ND FLOOR
6TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN ROAD,
MAHAGANAPATI LAYOUT, RAJAJINAGAR
BENGALURU

2. RAVINDRA S/O SANGAPPA HATTIGUDD
AGE:72 YEARS, OCC:RETIRED PERSON
R/O. HOUSE NO.86, 2ND FLOOR
6TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN ROAD
MAHAGANAPATI LAYOUT
RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU

3. JAGDISH S/O RAVINDRA HATTIGUDD
AGE:36 YEARS, OCC: ENGINEER
R/O HOUSE NO.86, 2ND FLOOR
6TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN ROAD
MAHAGANAPATI LAYOUT
RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU

4. ABHIJIT S/O RAVINDRA HATTIGUDD
AGE:32 YEARS, OCC:ENGINEER
R/O HOUSE NO.86, 2ND FLOOR
6TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN ROAD
MAHAGANAPATI LAYOUT
RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU
Crl.P.No.102386/2017

:2:

5. JYOTI D/O SHARANU HATTIGUDD
AGE:38 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEWIFE
R/O HOUSE NO.86, 2ND FLOOR
6TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN ROAD
MAHAGANAPATI LAYOUT
RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU

6. SHARANU S/O SHRISHAIL HATTIGUDD
AGE:48 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESSMAN
R/O HOUSE NO.86, 2ND FLOOR
6TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN ROAD
MAHAGANAPATI LAYOUT
RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU
… PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. JAGADISH PATIL, ADVOCATE – ABSENT)

AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH JAMKHANDI POLICE STATION
JAMAKHANDI, REPRESENTED BY IT’S
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENCH
AT: DHARWAD.

2. SMT. PRATIMA W/O MAHESH HATTIGUDD
AGE:26 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEWIFE
R/O RANI CHENNAMMA NAGAR, JAMKHANDI
TQ.:JAMKHANDI, DIST.:BAGALKOT
… RESPONDENTS

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION
482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS,
ALLOW THIS PETITION AND QUASH THE FIR CRIME
NO.101/2017 DATED 15.06.2017 REGISTERED BY
JAMKHANDI P.S., JAMAKHANDI FOR OFFENCES U/S 143,
147, 323, 498A, 504, 506, 149 IPC AND SECTIONS 3,4 OF
DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT AND ETC.
Crl.P.No.102386/2017

:3:

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-

ORDER

None app ears for the p etitioners.

Despite g ranting sufficient opportunity office

objections are not complied. Therefore petition is

dismissed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

gab

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation