SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Majedur Rahaman & Anr vs Unknown on 23 July, 2019

1

23.07.2019

.

71.
as
(Allowed).

C.R.M. 6441 of 2019

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 17.07.2019 in connection
with Itahar P. S. Case No.128 of 2019 dated 10.05.2019 under
Sections 498A/Section302/Section34 of the Indian Penal Code read with
Sections 3 / Section4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

In the matter of : Majedur Rahaman Anr.

… Petitioners.

Mr. Debashish Roy,
Mr. Shiladitya Banerjee,
Mr. Arif Molla.

…for the Petitioners.

Mr. Sudip Ghosh,
Mr. Apurba Kr. Datta.

…..for the State.

Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioner

no.2 is the married sister-in-law of the victim housewife and the

petitioner no.1 is her husband. It is also submitted that they did

not reside at the matrimonial home of the victim housewife during

her lifetime.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer

for bail and submits that the victim housewife was brutally

assaulted and murdered at her matrimonial home.
2

Having considered the materials on record and keeping in

mind the extent of complicity of the petitioners in the alleged crime

and in the light of the aforesaid submission that they were not at

the place of occurrence when the incident occurred, we are of the

opinion though custodial interrogation of the petitioners are not

necessary, they may be granted anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the

petitioners viz., Majedur Rahaman and Firdousi Begum shall be

released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each with

two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the

arresting officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under

Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on

further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the trial

court and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Manojit Mandal,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation