SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Majibar Mondal & Anr vs Unknown on 24 February, 2020

1

24.02.2020
33

Saswata
(Allowed).

C.R.M. 1938 of 2020

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 19.02.2020 in connection
with Balurghat P. S. Case No.51 of 2020 dated 29.01.2020 under
Sections 498A/323/307/34 of the IPC

In the matter of : Majibar Mondal anr.

… Petitioners.

Mr. Kaushik Chowdhury
…for the Petitioners.

Mr. Imran Ali
Mr. Mirza Firoj Ahmed Begg
… for the State
Mr. Ranjan Saha
… for de facto complainant

Having considered the materials on record and bearing in

mind the extent of complicity of the petitioners in the alleged

crime, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the

petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of

Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of

like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also

subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Petitioners shall appear before

the investigating officer and hand over their passports, if any, within

a period of four weeks from date. In the event the petitioners do not
2

have any passports, they shall personally appear before the

investigating officer and furnish affidavits to that effect within the

time frame mentioned herein above.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J)
3

24.02.2020
33
Saswata
(Allowed).

C.R.M. 1938 of 2020

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 19.02.2020 in connection
with Balurghat P. S. Case No.51 of 2020 dated 29.01.2020 under
Sections 498A/323/307/34 of the IPC

In the matter of : Majibar Mondal anr.

… Petitioners.

Mr. Kaushik Chowdhury
…for the Petitioners.

Mr. Imran Ali
Mr. Mirza Firoj Ahmed Begg
… for the State
Mr. Ranjan Saha
… for de facto complainant
4

Having considered the materials on record and bearing in

mind the extent of complicity of the petitioners in the alleged

crime, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the

petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of

Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of

like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also

subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Petitioners shall appear before

the investigating officer and hand over their passports, if any, within

a period of four weeks from date. In the event the petitioners do not

have any passports, they shall personally appear before the

investigating officer and furnish affidavits to that effect within the

time frame mentioned herein above.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J)
5

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation