SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Man Mohan vs State Of Haryana on 17 March, 2017

CRM No.M-42472 of 2016                                                        [1]


                                   Criminal Misc. No.M- 42472 of 2016(OM)
                                                Date of Decision: March 17 , 2017.

Man Mohan                  ...... PETITIONER (s)


State of Haryana           ...... RESPONDENT (s)


Present:    Mr. Jagjot Singh, Advocate for
            Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate
            for the petitioner.

            Mr. Anmol Malik, AAG, Haryana.

            Complainant in-person.
            1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see
               the judgment?
            2. To be referred to the reporters or not?
            3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?


Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioner in FIR No.749 dated 2.7.2016 under Sections 498A/406/354/34 IPC

registered at Police Station Chandni Bagh, Panipat, Haryana.

It is submitted that the parties who were referred for mediation

have amicably resolved the entire dispute between them. The

settlement/agreement dated 13.02.2017 arrived at between the parties before

the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court is on record.

                                      1 of 2
                   ::: Downloaded on - 25-03-2017 08:28:41 :::
 CRM No.M-42472 of 2016                                                         [2]

The complainant in this case Harjit Kaur (duly identified by the

Investigating Officer ASI Rajbir Singh) is present in Court as well. The

complainant affirms the factum of settlement between the parties. It is stated

that she has no objection to the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the

abovementioned circumstances.

Learned counsel for the State informs that the petitioner has joined

investigation and he is not required for custodial interrogation.

Keeping in view of the facts and circumstances but without

commenting upon or expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this

petition is allowed. Consequently, order dated 29.11.2016 is made absolute.

                                                        ( LISA GILL )
March 17 , 2017.                                            JUDGE

                   Whether speaking/reasoned:        Yes/No
                   Whether reportable:               Yes/No

                                     2 of 2
                  ::: Downloaded on - 25-03-2017 08:28:43 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Copyright © 2022 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation