SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Mandeep Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab And Another on 21 August, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M No.55572 of 2018
Date of decision: 21st August, 2019

Mandeep Singh another
… Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab another
… Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH

Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. Harbir Sandhu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab
for the respondent No.1/State.
None for respondent No.2.

FATEH DEEP SINGH, J. (ORAL)

Report dated 11.02.2019 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st

Class, Amritsar has been received whereby after recording statements of

complainant Gagandeep Kaur and the accused persons namely Mandeep

Singh and Lakhwinder Kaur, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the

compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties,

without any undue influence, coercion or pressure.

A perusal of the record reveals that the parties have given

final effect to their agreement settlement/compromise (Annexure P1) and

that nothing is due towards anyone on account of this settlement.

In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court and the fact

that the dispute between the parties being a pure matrimonial and the

offences for which the accused have been hauled up are not of serious

1 of 2
01-09-2019 18:17:22 :::
CRM-M No.55572 of 2018 2

nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in

ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in

view of the law laid down in ‘SectionGian Singh v. State of Punjab and

another’ 2012(4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and ‘SectionKulwinder Singh and

others v. State of Punjab and another’ 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal)

1052, the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of

FIR No.0074 dated 12.11.2018 under Sections 498A IPC and Section 4

of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 pertaining to Police Station Women,

Police Commissionerate Amritsar and all consequences arising out of the

said FIR qua the petitioners are quashed.

The petition stands disposed off in those terms.

(FATEH DEEP SINGH)
JUDGE
August 21, 2019
rps
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/No

2 of 2
01-09-2019 18:17:22 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation