CRR 363 of 2020
Ct. No. 32
In the matter of:- Manjula Chakraborty @ Majula Rani Chakraborty Ors.
Mr. Abhra Mukherjee,
Mr. Sauradeep Dutta.
…for the petitioners.
This is an application praying for quashing of a proceeding in
which a charge sheet was submitted under Sections 323, 498A and 506 of
the Penal Code.
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits
as follows. The de facto complainant/opposite party no.2 initiated the
impugned proceeding only against the mother-in-law and some other in-
laws of hers and not against her husband. This is the ploy of opposite party
no.2 and her husband to grab the property of the petitioner no.1. Earlier, a
civil suit was filed by mother-in-law against the husband of the opposite
party no.2 as regards actions of the de facto complainant/husband in trying
to grab the business and the property of the petitioner no.1. After receiving
a notice for the said suit, the de facto complainant and her husband
conspired to foist the impugned false proceeding against the petitioners.
Let the petitioners serve a copy of this application upon the State
through the learned Public Prosecutor and upon the opposite party no.2 by
speed post with acknowledgment due, within a week. An affidavit of
service to that effect shall be filed on the next date of hearing.
Let this matter appear as a ‘Contested Application’ two weeks
The impugned proceeding shall remain stayed for a period of five
weeks from this date.
The parties shall be at liberty to pray for extension or modification
or vacating of the interim order upon notice to the other side.
The State is directed to produce the case diary on the next date
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to
the parties expeditiously, if applied for.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)