SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Manmohan Verma And Ors vs State Of Punjab And Orss on 4 September, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M No.45610 of 2018
Date of decision: 4th September, 2019

Manmohan Verma others
… Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab another
… Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH

Present: Petitioners in person along with their counsel
Mr. Arnav K. Sood, Advocate.
Mr. Harbir Sandhu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab
for the respondent No.1/State.
Respondent No.2 in person.

FATEH DEEP SINGH, J. (ORAL)

Report dated 03.09.2019 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st

Class, Ludhiana has been received whereby after recording statements of

complainant Harshleena and the accused persons namely Manmohan

Verma, Veena Rani, Shivani and Manpreet Singh, the Court has shown

its satisfaction that the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of

free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or

pressure.

Moreover, during the course of interaction with the parties,

they have shown their resolve to end the dispute and have made

statements that they have compromised the matter as per compromise

(Annexure P2) dated 28.08.2018 and shall abide by the same.

1 of 2
03-10-2019 05:29:35 :::
CRM-M No.45610 of 2018 2

Heard.

In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court and the fact

that the dispute between the parties being a pure matrimonial and the

offenses for which the accused have been hauled up are not of serious

nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in

ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in

view of the law laid down in ‘SectionGian Singh v. State of Punjab and

another’ 2012(4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and ‘SectionKulwinder Singh and

others v. State of Punjab and another’ 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal)

1052, the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of

FIR No.0062 dated 23.08.2018 under Sections 406, Section498A IPC pertaining

to Police Station Women, Ludhiana and all consequences arising out of

the said FIR qua the petitioners are quashed.

The petition stands disposed off in those terms.

(FATEH DEEP SINGH)
JUDGE
September 4, 2019
rps
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/No

2 of 2
03-10-2019 05:29:36 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation