SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Manoj Kumar vs State Of Punjab on 15 December, 2017

205 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

Criminal Misc. No. M- 44630 of 2016 (OM)
Date of decision : December 15, 2017

Manoj Kumar …..Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ….Respondent

CORAM:- HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL

Present: Mr. Chandan Singh Rana, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Mr. Saurav Khurana, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Arjun Sharma, Advocate
for the complainant.
***
LISA GILL, J.

Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioner in FIR No. 88 dated 11.08.2016 under Sections 498A/406 IPC

registered at Police Station Women, District Ludhiana.

It is submitted that during pendency of this petition, the matter

has been amicably settled before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of

this Court on 19.09.2017. Settlement/agreement dated 19.09.2017 is

attached with the file of this case. Petition under Section 13B of the Hindu

Marriage Act, 1955 has been filed by the petitioner and his wife –

complainant. Part of the settled amount has been handed over to the

complainant. The petitioner undertakes to abide by the terms and conditions

of the settlement. It is, thus, prayed that this petition be allowed.

Learned counsel for the complainant affirms and verifies the

factum of the settlement between the parties and submits that the

complainant has no objection, in case, this petition is allowed subject to the

petitioner strictly adhering to the terms and conditions of the settlement.

1 of 2
23-12-2017 23:37:20 :::
Criminal Misc. No. M- 44630 of 2016 (OM) -2-

Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Bhajan

Singh, verifies that the petitioner has joined investigation.

There are no allegations on behalf of the State that the

petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the

witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances noted above but

without expressing any opinion on the merits of case, it is considered just

and expedient to allow this petition. Consequently, order dated 14.12.2016

is made absolute.

(Lisa Gill)
December 15, 2017 Judge
rts
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No

Whether reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
23-12-2017 23:37:21 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation