SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Manoj P vs State Of Kerala on 20 March, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS

WEDNESDAY,THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 29TH PHALGUNA, 1940

Bail Appl..No. 1988 of 2019

CRIME NO. 157/2019 OF Kasaba Police Station , Kozhikode

PETITIONER/S:

1 MANOJ P.
AGED 46 YEARS
S/O. PURUSHOTHAMAN, PUTHANPARAMBIL VEETTIL, 4TH
LINE, KALOOR P.O, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682017

2 SOBHANA,
AGED 68 YEARS
W/O. PURUSHOTHAMAN, PUTHANPARAMBIL VEETTIL, 4TH
LINE, KALOOR P.O, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682017

BY ADVS.
SMT.DHANYA BABU
SRI.P.S.SYAMKUTTAN

RESPONDENT/S:
STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031.

OTHER PRESENT:
SRI.AMJAD ALI, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
20.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.

B.A.No. 1988 of 2019

Dated this the 20th day of March, 2019
ORDER

The petitioners are the accused in Crime No. 157/2017 of

Kozhikode Kasba Police Station, Kozhikode, which has been

registered for offence punishable under Sec. 498A of the I.P.C., on

the basis of the first information statement of the lady defacto

complainant, who is the wife of the 1st petitioner. The 2nd petitioner is

the mother of the 1st petitioner.

2. The prosecution case is that after the marriage of the lady

defacto complainant with the 1st petitioner, she has been subjected to

cruelty and harassment by the petitioners. The case of the petitioners

is that they are innocent of the allegations levelled against them.

3. Having heard both sides and having regard to the nature

of the offences as well as the allegations raised in the case, this Court

is of the view that the plea for pre-arrest bail could be considered.

Accordingly, it is ordered that in the event of the petitioners being

arrested by the Police in connection with the abovesaid crime, they

shall be released on their executing separate bonds for Rs.40,000/-

B.A.1988/19 – : 3 :-

each and on each of them furnishing two solvent sureties for the like

sum, each to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer concerned.

Further it is also ordered that it will be subject to following

conditions:-

(i) The petitioners shall not involve in any criminal offences of similar nature.

(ii) The petitioners shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The petitioners shall report before the investigating officer as and when
required in that connection.

(iv) The petitioners shall not influence witnesses or shall not tamper or attempt to
tamper evidence in any manner, whatsoever.

If there is any violation of the abovesaid conditions by the

petitioners, then the jurisdictional court concerned will stand hereby

empowered to consider the plea for cancellation of bail at the

appropriate time.

With these observations and directions, the above Bail

Application will stand disposed of.

Sd/-

sdk+ ALEXANDER THOMAS, JUDGE

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2019 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh