SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Manoj Pandey vs State Of Chhattisgarh 20 … on 27 June, 2019

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRA No. 796 of 2003
Manoj Pandey Versus State Of Chhattisgarh

27.06.2019

Mr. J.A. Lohani, counsel for the appellant.

Mr. Vikram Dixit, Govt. Advocate for the State.
Mr. S.K. Mishra, Advocate for the complainant.
Appellant is present .

Prosecutrix Shoba Singh is present.
Appellant was convicted for the offences punishable under Section 354
and Section506(2) IPC. Section 506(2) is not compoundable. Section 354 IPC at the
time of comission of offence was compoundable but today is not
compoundable.

Fix this case for consideration of I.A. No1 and I.A.No.2.
List this case on 27.08.2019.

Sd/-

(Sharad Kumar Gupta)
Judge

PARUL

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation