SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Mansingbhai Gemubhai Dhadvi vs State Of Gujarat on 23 December, 2019

R/CR.MA/22635/2019 ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 22635 of 2019

MANSINGBHAI GEMUBHAI DHADVI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT

Appearance:
MR ASHISH M DAGLI(2203) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR.J.K.SHAH, APP, (2) for the Respondent(s) No. 1

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE

Date : 23/12/2019
ORAL ORDER

1. This application is filed by the applicant under Section
439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for regular bail in
connection with FIR registered as C.R. No.I-248 of 2019 with
Kapodra Police Station, Surat for the offence punishable
under Sections 306, Section498A and Section114 of the Indian Penal Code
and under Sections 3 and Section4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

2. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant
submits that considering the nature of offence, the applicant
may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable
conditions.

3. On the other hand, the learned Additional Public
Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State has opposed
grant of regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the
offence.

4. Learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the respective
parties do not press for a further reasoned order.

Page 1 of 4

Downloaded on : Tue Dec 24 20:45:38 IST 2019

R/CR.MA/22635/2019 ORDER

5. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf
of the respective parties and perused the papers. Following
aspects are considered :-

I) The First Information Report is registered on
14.11.2019 for the offence which is alleged to have taken
place between 06.05.2017 to 18.10.2019.

II)The applicant is in custody since 21.02.2018.

III) The investigation qua the applicant is concluded as
the remand period is over.

IV) The applicant is uncle-in-law of the deceased and
used to reside separately however, arraigned as an
accused as he had accompanied other while taking the
dead body.

V) Considering the submission of learned advocate for
the applicant that the applicant is having two daughters,
who are of marriageable age.

VI) No other antecedent is reported against the applicant
or allegation which would attract Section 306 of IPC to
the applicant.

VII)Learned Additional Public Prosecutor under the
instructions of the Investigating Officer is unable to bring
on record any special circumstances against the
applicant.

Page 2 of 4

Downloaded on : Tue Dec 24 20:45:38 IST 2019
R/CR.MA/22635/2019 ORDER

6. In the facts and circumstances of the case and

considering the nature of the allegations made against the
applicant in the First Information Report, without discussing
the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion
that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the
applicant on regular bail.

7. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant
is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with
C.R. No.I-248 of 2019 with Kapodra Police Station, Surat
on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten
Thousand Only) with one surety of the like amount to the
satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that
he shall;

(a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the
prosecution shall not obstruct or hamper the police
investigation and shall not to play mischief with the
evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police;

(c) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a
week;

(d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior
permission of the Trial Court concerned;

(e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station
once in a month for a period of six months between 11.00
a.m. and 2.00 p.m.;

(f) furnish the present address of his residence to the
Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of
execution of the bond and shall not change the residence
without prior permission of Trial Court;

Page 3 of 4

Downloaded on : Tue Dec 24 20:45:38 IST 2019

R/CR.MA/22635/2019 ORDER

8. The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not
required in connection with any other offence for the time
being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed,
the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or
take appropriate action in the matter.

9. Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having
jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned
Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above
conditions, in accordance with law.

10. At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the
observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this
stage made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.

11. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is
made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct Service is
permitted.

(A.Y. KOGJE, J)
Siddharth

Page 4 of 4

Downloaded on : Tue Dec 24 20:45:38 IST 2019

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation