C.R.M. 5467 of 2019
In Re: – An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438
of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 26.06.2019 in
connection with Jalangi P.S. Case No. 320/2019 dated
12.05.2019 under Sections 498A/Section307/Section34 of the Indian Penal
In the matter of: Masidul Sk
Mr. T. Gupta,
Mr. P.S. Mondal,
Mr. P.K. Kundu,
Mr. P. Ganguly
…for the petitioner.
Mr. A. Ganguly,
Mr. S.K. Das
…for the State.
Heard the learned advocate appearing for both the
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is a
matrimonial dispute between the parties and he has been
falsely implicated in the instant case.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State
opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
Having considered the materials in the case diary and
bearing in mind the general and omnibus nature of allegations
and as no external injury was detected at the time of medical
examination, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the
In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on
bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties
of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer
and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under
Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on
further condition that the petitioner shall meet the
investigating officer once in a week until further orders and on
condition that the petitioner shall appear before the court
below and pray for regular bail within a fortnight from date.
The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.
(Manojit Mandal, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)