SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Meetu Goyal vs Deepak Goyal on 6 May, 2019

T.A. No. 914 of 2018 1


T.A. No. 914 of 2018
DATE OF DECISION :- May 06, 2019

Meetu …Applicant


Deepak Goyal …Respondent


Present:- Mr. Jatin Hans, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. G.S. Kuka, Advocate for the respondent.


Applicant Meetu, aged about 30 years, wife of Deepak Goyal-

respondent, presently residing with her parents at Bhiwani on account of

matrimonial discord between the spouses, by way of filing the instant

application seeks transfer of petition under Section 13 (ia) (ib) of the SectionHindu

Marriage Act filed by her husband Deepak Goyal against her having title

‘Deepal Goel Vs. Meetu’ pending in the Court of District and Sessions

Judge, Sirsa to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Bhiwani.

According to the applicant, she was married with the

respondent on 24.1.2015. Thereafter they started residing together, however,

after few days the respondent and his family members started harassing and

maltreating the applicant in connection with demand of dowry. The

applicant had reported the matter to the police and got registered formal

1 of 4
12-05-2019 21:08:31 :::
T.A. No. 914 of 2018 2

F.I.R. No. 0280 dated 19.5.2018 with police of Police Station Bhiwani,

District Bhiwani for offences under Sections 323, Section354, Section376, Section406, Section498A, Section506,

Section511 and Section34 IPC. After being thrown out of the matrimonial home she is

residing at her parental place. The respondent has filed divorce petition

against her to harass and torture her. The applicant has filed petition under

Section 125 Cr.P.C. against the responded in the Court at Bhiwani. The

applicant does not have any source of income and is dependent upon her

father to meet her basic needs. It is difficult for her to travel from Bhiwani

to Sirsa to attend the dates of hearing in the Court there, covering a distance

of 150 kms on one side, more particularly she does not have any male or

female family member to accompany her, therefore, the application be


Notice of the application was given to the respondent, who has

put in appearance through counsel vehemently opposing the application

submitting that no ground is made out for transfer of the case.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties besides going

through the record.

The Apex Court in various judgments has observed that in

matrimonial disputes between the spouses convenience of wife should be

looked into. In that regard a reference can be made to authority Sumita Singh

Versus Kumar Sanjay and another, 2002 AIR(SC) 396 by a Division Bench

of Hon’ble Supreme Court.

In Bhartiben Ravibhai Rav Versus Ravibhai Govindbhai Rav,

2017(3) RCR(Civil) 369, the Apex Court had allowed application for transfer of

the divorce petition to a place where the wife was residing considering various

2 of 4
12-05-2019 21:08:31 :::
T.A. No. 914 of 2018 3

factors including the distance between the place where the wife was residing

and the place of sitting of the Court where divorce petition had been instituted

and the fact that the wife had filed two cases against her husband in the Court at

the place of her residence wherein the respondent had already put in


In Apurva Versus Navtej Singh, 2017(2) Law Herald 966 by a

Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, it was observed that wherever the Courts are

called upon to consider the plea of transfer in matrimonial disputes, the Courts

have to take into consideration various factors like economic soundness of

either of the parties, the social strata of the spouses to which they belong and

behavioural pattern, standard of life antecedents of marriage. Generally it is the

wife’s convenience, which must be looked at by the Courts while deciding the

transfer application.

Keeping in view the contentions in the application and

submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant, in which I find merit,

in absence of any strong circumstance to the contrary, it would be proper and

appropriate if the application is accepted. The same is accordingly allowed.

The petition in question is ordered to be withdrawn from the Court of District

and Sessions Judge, Sirsa and transferred to Family Court at Bhiwani for

disposal in accordance with law.

The parties through their counsel are directed to appear in the

transferee Court on 30.5.2019. Copies of orders be sent to the Court of

District and Sessions Judge, Sirsa as well as to the Family Court at Bhiwani

for information and necessary compliance.

The Superintendent of Police, Bhiwani is directed to ensure that

3 of 4
12-05-2019 21:08:31 :::
T.A. No. 914 of 2018 4

no physical harm is caused to the respondent or to his family members or

persons accompanying him when he/they go to Bhiwani to attend the dates

of hearing. A copy of this order be sent to Superintendent of Police,

Bhiwani also.

May 06, 2019

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No

Whether Reportable Yes/No

4 of 4
::: Downloaded on – 12-05-2019 21:08:31 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.


Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation