SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Mehmoodali Usman Ali vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 17 February, 2020

Rane 1/3 ABA-175-2019 (SR.3)
17 February, 2020.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 175 OF 2019

Mehmoodali Usman Ali ….Applicant
v/s.
The State of Maharashtra
and anr. ….Respondents

****

Mr. Sajid A. Qureshi, Advocate for the applicant.
Mrs. J.S. Lohakare, APP for the State-respondent
no.1.
Mr. Ali Kashif Khan Deshmukh, Advocate for
respondent no.2.
Ms. Aliya Shaikh, complainant present.

CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.

Monday, 17th February, 2020.

P.C. :

1. Heard. Complainant-respondent no.3 is
present. She is represented by Advocate.

2. Parties have settled the dispute and in
consideration, applicant has paid Rs.10,00,000/-

::: Uploaded on – 18/02/2020 19/02/2020 07:14:55 :::

Rane 2/3 ABA-175-2019 (SR.3)
17 February, 2020.

to the complainant. Complainant acknowledges
receipt of Rs.10,00,000/-.

3. In view of the settlement arrived at
between the parties, in my view, custodial
interrogation of the applicant is not required.

4. In the circumstances, in the event of
arrest of the applicant in C.R. No. 406/2018
registered with Oshiwara Police Station for the
offences punishable under Sections 406 and 498A of
the Indian Penal Code, he shall be released on bail
on furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.10,000/- ( Rs. Ten
Thousand only) with one or two sureties in the like
sum.

5. The applicant shall attend the concerned
Police Station as and when called.

6. The applicant shall furnish the
particulars of his place of residence and contact
details to the Investigating Officer of the
Police Station concerned within seven days from
today.

::: Uploaded on – 18/02/2020 19/02/2020 07:14:55 :::

Rane 3/3 ABA-175-2019 (SR.3)
17 February, 2020.

7. The applicant shall not tamper with the
evidence or attempt to influence or contact the
complainant, witnesses or any person concerned
with the case.

8. It is made clear that observations made
hereinabove shall be construed as expression of
opinion only for the purpose of granting bail and
the same shall not in any way influence the trial
in other proceedings.

(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)

::: Uploaded on – 18/02/2020 19/02/2020 07:14:55 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation