Rane 1/5 ABA-1015-2018 (SR.4)
20.12.2018
AIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1015 OF 2018
Mohammed Karam Raju Shah …Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra and anr. ….Respondents
*****
Mr. Satyaram R. Gaud, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. Omkar Nagvekar I/by. Ms. Trupti M. Khamkar,
appointed from Legal Aid Committee, for respondent
no.2.
Mr. H.J. Dedhia, APP for the State-respondent no.1.
API. Mr. Dangarne, Nehru Nagar Police Station present.
Coram : Sandeep K. Shinde, J.
Thursday, 20 th December, 2018.
P.C. :
1. The applicant is apprehending arrest in C.R.
No. 150 of 2018 registered at Nehru Nagar Police Station
::: Uploaded on – 20/12/2018 25/12/2018 22:25:22 :::
Rane 2/5 ABA-1015-2018 (SR.4)
20.12.2018
for the offences punishable under Section 498A, 504
read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant.
Perused the written submissions submitted by the
Advocate on the legal panel. Perused the order dated
22nd May, 2018. Since the parties were likely to settle
the dispute on 22nd May, 2018 interim order was passed
in favour of the applicant.
3. Today, it is submitted across the bar that, the
dispute could not be settled and thus the matter is taken
up for hearing on merits.
4. Perused the complaint. Out of five accused,
four were granted anticipatory bail. The other accused
are the brother-in-law, father-in-law and sister-in-law of
the complainant. The marriage was solemnised on 15 th
May, 2011. It is submitted that the husband has filed
application for restitution of conjugal rights in April,
2017 and the complaint has been filed in April, 2018 and
hence after thought. It is submitted that the
complainant-wife who is the respondent before the
::: Uploaded on – 20/12/2018 25/12/2018 22:25:22 :::
Rane 3/5 ABA-1015-2018 (SR.4)
20.12.2018
Family Court has not appeared, and the proceedings
were directed to proceed ex-parte. It is submitted that
the allegations in the complaint are general in nature
and there is nothing in the complaint to indicate that
there was unlawful demand made by the accused and
for not fulfilling it, she was subjected to harassment.
5. That as against this, it is submitted by
the complainant that, she has appeared before the
Family Court and has also filed proceedings under the
Domestic Violence Act. It is submitted that though
interim order of maintenance has been passed by the
learned Magistrate in the domestic violence
proceedings, the same has not been paid. It is submitted
that, as on today, Rs.40,000/- is due and payable being
arrears of maintenance. The learned Counsel appearing
for the applicant submits on instructions that, the
applicant shall pay Rs.40,000/- within two months from
today in two equal installments and it may be accepted
as Undertaking by the applicant. The Undertaking is
accepted.
::: Uploaded on – 20/12/2018 25/12/2018 22:25:22 :::
Rane 4/5 ABA-1015-2018 (SR.4)
20.12.2018
6. The complainant is present in Court. She is
directed to supply her Bank Account details to the
Advocate for the applicant so as to enable him to
transfer the amount of arrears directly in her Account
in two equal installments of Rs.20,000/- each.
7. It is made clear that, order directing payment
of arrears is passed on concession and thus Appeal filed
by the applicant, against the order passed in the
proceedings under The Domestic Violence Act, shall be
decided independently. Thus, considering the facts of
the case and the proceedings pending before the various
Courts and also looking into the allegations made in the
complaint, I am inclined to allow the application. Hence,
the following order :
(i) In the event of arrest of the applicant in
C.R. No. 150 of 2018 registered at Nehru Nagar
Police Station for the offences punishable
under Section 498A, 504 read with Section 34
of the Indian Penal Code, the applicant be
::: Uploaded on – 20/12/2018 25/12/2018 22:25:22 :::
Rane 5/5 ABA-1015-2018 (SR.4)
20.12.2018released on P.R. Bond of Rs.25,000/- with one
or more sureties in the like amount;
(ii) The applicant shall co-operate in the
investigation and shall not tamper with the
prosecution witnesses.
(iii) Liberty is granted to the complainant to
move this Court, if the amount of maintenance
is not paid.
(iv) With this, the Application stands disposed
of.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
::: Uploaded on – 20/12/2018 25/12/2018 22:25:22 :::