IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANNIE JOHN
TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 / 21ST KARTHIKA, 1941
Crl.MC.No.7539 OF 2015
CRIME NO.234/2015 OF Sreekrishnapuram Police Station , Palakkad
PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED :-
MOHAMMED KOYA
AGED 58 YEARS
S/O.ALIAMMU, THAZHATHETHIL VEEDU, MANNAMPATTA POST,
ESWARAMANGALAM, PALAKKAD.
BY ADVS.
SRI.SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT
SRI.K.N.ABHILASH
SRI.M.A.AHAMMAD SAHEER
RESPONDENTS/STATE COMPLAINANT :-
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031.
2 SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
SREEKRISHNAPURAM POLICE STATION,
SREEKRISHNAPURAM, PALAKKAD-679513.
3 FOUSIA
AGED 26 YEARS
D/O.MARAKKAR, POMPRA POST, OTTAPPALAM,
PALAKKAD-679101.
R1 R2 BY SRI.M.S.BREEZ, SR.P.P
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
12.11.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No.7539 OF 2015
2
ORDER
Dated this the 12th day of November 2019
This petition is filed against the FIR
No.234/2015 dated 26.03.2015 of the Sreekrishnapuram
Police Station, Palakkad District. The petitioner is
the 2nd accused in FIR No.234/2015 of the
Sreekrishnapuram Police Station registered under
Sections 498A, 406 and 420 r/w 34 of the Indian
Penal Code. The FIR was registered on the basis of
Annexure-A1 complaint filed by the 3rd respondent
before the JFCM Ottappalam, which was subsequently
forwarded to the Sreekrishnapuram Police Station for
investigation. Accordingly, the 2nd respondent has
registered Annexure-A2 FIR against the petitioners.
2. Now the petition has taken for
consideration, the learned Public Prosecutor has
submitted that the charge sheet has already filed on
30.05.2015, now the case stands for trial.
3. The statement filed by the Sub Inspector
of Police of the Sreekrishnapuram Police Station is
Crl.MC.No.7539 OF 2015
3
filed this Court on 11.12.2015. Now the present
petition is filed to quash the entire proceedings
initiated in FIR No.234/2015. Since, the charge
sheet is already filed before filing of the
petition, I find that the prayer in the petition
has become infructuous. It is only liable to be
dismissed.
In the result, this Crl.M.C is dismissed.
Sd/-
ANNIE JOHN
JUDGE
SMA
Crl.MC.No.7539 OF 2015
4
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)’ ANNEXURES :-
ANNEXURE-A1 : TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT NO.1787/2015 BY
THE THIRD RESPONDENT BEFORE THE JFCM,
OTTAPPALAM.
ANNEXURE-A2 : TRUE COPY OF THE FIR NO.234/2015 DATED
25.03.2015 OF THE SREEKRISHNAPURAM POLICE
STATION.
RESPONDENT(S)’ ANNEXURES :- NIL
//TRUE COPY//
PA TO JUDGE
SMA
