SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Mohan Lal vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 8 May, 2018

Criminal Misc. No. M-37554-2015
Date of Decision: May 08, 2018.





Present: Mr. Vikram Jeet Singh, Advocate,
for the petitioner.

Mr. D.S. Sukarchakia, DAG, Punjab.


Prayer in this petition is for directing the respondents to search/trace

out the minor grandson (son of the petitioner’s daughter) who is missing since


It is submitted that the petitioner’s daughter was married with one

Madan Lal. Allegations of ill-treatment and harassment at the hands of his son-in-

law were raised. FIR No. 112 dated 11.07.2013, was initially registered under

Section 306 IPC, against the petitioner’s son-in-law and others at Police Station

Chamkaur Sahib, District Rupnagar. Thereafter, Section 498A, 304B of IPC were

added. Dead body of the petitioner’s daughter was recovered from the Sirhind

Canal. Cause of death was found to be poisoning. The petitioner’s son-in-law and

his father were convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rupanagar,

vide judgment dated 30.10.2017.

It is contended that the petitioner’s grandson had also gone missing

with the petitioner’s daughter. His daughter’s body was found in the Sirhind Canal

but the minor grandson was never traced out. It is further contended that the child

1 of 3
20-05-2018 01:20:09 :::
is still alive. Reference is made to an affidavit dated 25.01.2017 executed by one

Suresh Chander and Gopal Lal. Learned counsel submits that it is highly

improbable that the petitioner’s daughter would have taken minor child alongwith

her after consuming poison and jumped into Sirhind Canal with the child. It is

thus, prayed that this petition be allowed.

Learned counsel for the State, submits that the petitioner earlier filed

CRWP No. 1022 of 2014 seeking a writ of Habeas Corpus for production of his

grandson. Reply on behalf of the State was duly filed in the said case. It was

specifically mentioned therein that even as per the statement of the petitioner in

the proceedings under Section 174 Cr. P.C. recorded after the death of his

daughter, he had stated that his daughter was ill-treated by his son-in-law and she

committed suicide by plunging into the canal alongwith her minor child. Dead

body of his daughter was traced out from the canal but the child could not be

traced out. It was opined by the divers that since the canal is katcha and child

being an infant might even have been devoured by the water animals. The said

CRWP No. 1022 of 2014 was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the

petitioner to avail alternative remedy as available to him, in accordance with law.

It is thus contended that the present petition under Section 482 Cr. P.C. seeking

similar relief, though couched in different words is not maintainable.

In the reply filed in the present petition by way of affidavit dated

10.02.2016 of Smt. Kanwardeep Kaur, IPS, Assistant Superintendent of Police,

Sri Chamkaur Sahib, District Roopnagar, it is specifically mentioned that in case

the petitioner is able to furnish any kind of information regarding the minor child

still being alive, all kind of assistance shall be rendered to him for tracing out the

minor child. As per another affidavit dated 23.05.2016, filed by Kanwardeep

Kaur, IPS, Assistant Superintendent of Police, Sri Chamkaur Sahib, District

Rupanagar, in this case, it is mentioned that call detail records of certain mobiles

2 of 3
20-05-2018 01:20:10 :::
numbers of persons suspected to be having the custody of the minor child given

by the petitioner were thoroughly examined and verified but no clue of the minor

child being in custody of any other person or being alive was found.

Learned counsel for the State reiterates that in case the petitioner is

still able to furnish any kind of evidence/proof regarding the minor child being

alive, necessary action shall immediately be taken thereon.

Keeping in view the above facts, no further orders are called for in

this case.

Petition is disposed of.

May 08, 2018 JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/No

3 of 3
20-05-2018 01:20:10 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation