C.R.M. 4196 of 2018
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 25.06.2018 in connection
with Thakurpukur P.S. Case No.63 of 2018 dated 08.03.2018
under Sections 307/498A/406/34/376/511 of the Indian Penal
Code read with Section 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
In the matter of : Mr. Pintu Mitra.
Mr. Anirban Dutta.
…for the Petitioner.
Mr. Arijit Ganguly,
Mr. Avik Ghatak.
…..for the State.
Heard the learned Counsels appearing on behalf of the
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is the
father-in-law of the victim housewife and that there is delay in
lodging the First Information Report.
Learned Advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer
Having considered the materials in the Case Diary and
bearing in mind the nature of allegations in the light of the
aforesaid submissions made on behalf of the petitioner and in view
of the extent of complicity of the petitioner in the alleged crime, we
are of the opinion that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is
not necessary and he may be granted anticipatory bail.
Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the
petitioner, namely, Mr. Pintu Mitra shall be released on bail upon
furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount
each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to the
conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973.
This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.
(Ravi Krishan Kapur,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)