SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Mr. Sumit Tyagi vs The State Of Karnataka on 31 August, 2018

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF AUGUST 2018

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6680 OF 2018

BETWEEN:

1. MR. SUMIT TYAGI
S/O LATE ANAND PRAKASH TYAGI
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
R/A NO.202, B BLOCK
SRI MITRA SPRING VALLEY
KAIKONDRAHALI LAKE ROAD
AMBALIPURA, HARALUR
SARJAPUR ROAD
BANGALORE-560035

2. SHANKY TYAGI
W/O BHARATH R CHABBRIA
R/A NO.410, A BLOCK
SRI MITRA SPRING VALLEY
KAIKONDRAHALI LAKE ROAD
AMBALIPURA, HARALUR
SARJAPUR ROAD
BANGALORE-560035

3. MANSI TYAGI
W/O LATE MR VIPIN KUMAR TYAGI
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
R/A NO.503, B BLOCK
SRI MITRA SPRING VALLEY
KAIKONDRAHALI LAKE ROAD
AMBALIPURA, HARALUR
SARJAPUR ROAD
BANGALORE-560035
2

4. BHARATH R CHABBRIA
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
R/A NO.410, A BLOCK
SRI MITRA SPRING VALLEY
KAIKONDRAHALI LAKE ROAD
AMBALIPURA, HARALUR
SARJAPUR ROAD
BANGALORE-560035
… PETITIONERS

(BY SRI: B SIDDESWARA, ADVOCATE)

AND

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BELLANDUR P S
BANGALORE
REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT COMPLEX
BANGALORE-560001

2. MRS MAMATHA P
D/O PRAHALLAD
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
R/A NO.202, B BLOCK
SRIMITRA SPRING VALLEY
AMBALIPURA, HARALUR
BANGALORE CITY
KARNATAKA-560035

ALSO AT:NO.22, 1ST B MAIN ROAD
BEST COUNTY-2
NEAR SAMBRAM COLLEGE
HESARAGATTA MAIN ROAD
VIDYARANYAPURA
BANGALORE-560097. … RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI: S.RACHAIAH, HCGP FOR R1
SRI: BASAVARAJ R.Y., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
3

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH
THE FIR IN CRIME NO.114/2018, OF BELLANDURU POLICE
STATION FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS
498A,504 R/W 34 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE VI
ACMM, BANGALORE.

THIS CRL.P COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-

ORDER

Petitioner No.1 Sri. Sumit Tyagi, petitioner No.2 Smt.

Shanky Tyagi, petitioner No.3 Smt. Mansi Tyagi and petitioner

No.4 Sri. Bharath R. Chabbria are present alongwith their

counsel Sri. B. Siddeswara.

On behalf of respondent No.1-State Sri. S. Rachaiah,

learned HCGP takes notice of the petition.

Respondent No.2-Smt. Mamatha P. is present. On her

behalf Sri. Basavaraj R.Y.., learned counsel seeks leave to enter

appearance. Learned counsel is permitted to file vakalath in the

Registry.

4

2. The parties have filed a joint memo duly signed by the

petitioners and respondent No.2 and their respective counsels

stating that the parties have mutually settled their differences in

the mediation centre in M.C.No.4223/2018. The copy of the

memorandum of settlement dated 27.08.2018 is produced

before the Court. The parties reiterate that in terms of the said

settlement, the marriage between petitioner No.1 and

respondent No.2 is dissolved by mutual consent. The respondent

No.2 states that in terms of the above compromise, she has

withdrawn all the allegations made against the petitioners and

seeks to quash the proceedings pending against the petitioners

in Cr.No.114/2018 for the alleged offences punishable under

sections 498-A, 504 r/w 34 Indian Penal Code.

3. Both the parties submits that the compromise arrived at

between them is evidenced in the memorandum of settlement

and the aforesaid settlement is free and voluntary. In view of the

said facts, there is no impediment to accept the joint memo and

the compromise filed by the parties.

5

4. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. The proceedings

initiated against the petitioners in Cr.No.114/2018 for the

alleged offences punishable under sections 498-A, 504 r/w 34

Indian Penal Code are hereby quashed.

In view of disposal of the main matter, I.A.No.1/18 for

stay does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, it is

dismissed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

*mn/-

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation