SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Mukhram vs State on 9 January, 2020

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12175/2019

1. Mukhram S/o Shri Sahiram, Aged About 56 Years, R/o.

Ward No. 19, Suratgarh, District Sriganganagar.

2. Vijay Laxmi W/o Mukhram, Aged About 53 Years, R/o.

Ward No. 19, Suratgarh, District Sriganganagar.

—-Petitioners
Versus
State of Rajasthan

—-Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : MR. Mahaveer Bishnoi
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Farzand Ali, AAG-cum-GA assisted
by Mr. Shrawan Bishnoi, PP
Mr. Jitender Singh Bhaleria, for the
complainant

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Order

09/01/2020
This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the

petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with F.I.R.

No.122/2019, Police Station Mahila Thana, Sriganganagar for the

offences under Sections 406, 498A, 354, 377 511 of IPC.

Heard learned counsels for the parties. Perused the material

available on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present

petitioners are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the complainant

(Anju Sharma). He further submits that husband (Rajiv Kumar)

has already been arrested in the present case. The husband

(Rajiv Kumar) and wife(Anju Sharma- complainant) are living

(Downloaded on 09/01/2020 at 08:59:29 PM)
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-12175/2019]

separately since 2017. Therefore, it is prayed that the present

petitioners may be enlarged on anticipatory bail.

Learned Additional Advocate General-cum-Government

Advocate assisted by learned Public Prosecutor learned counsel

for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and

upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this

Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory

bail to the petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed

that in the event of arrest of petitioners (1)Mukhram S/o Shri

Sahiram, and (2)Vijay Laxmi W/o Mukhram in connection with

F.I.R. No.122/2019, Police Station Mahila Thana, Sriganganagar

the petitioners shall be released on bail; provided they furnish a

personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees: Fifty Thousand

Only) along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees: Twenty Five

Thosuand Only) each to the satisfaction of the concerned

Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions :-

(i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for
interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with
the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing
such facts to the court or any police officer; and

(iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous
permission of the court.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
96-SunilS/-

(Downloaded on 09/01/2020 at 08:59:29 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation