SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Mumal vs State on 16 July, 2021

Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5593/2021

1. Mumal W/o Pradeep, Aged About 30 Years, Pahadganj-Ii,
Nearby Bhomiyaji Ka Than, Kishore Ka Bag, Mandor Road,
Jodhpur

2. Gendu Kanwar W/o Badri Dan, Aged About 50 Years,
Village Parlu, Tehsil Pachpadra, Dis. Barmer

—-Petitioners
Versus
State, Through Pp

—-Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr Dhirendra Singh assisted by Ms
Priyanka
For Respondent(s) : Mr Vikram Singh, Public Prosecutor

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA

Judgment / Order

16/07/2021

This bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed

by the petitioners apprehending arrest in connection with FIR

No.64/2021 registered at Police Station Mahila (East) Jodhpur,

District Jodhpur Metropolitan for offence under Sections 498A,

406, 323, 341, 376, 377, 120B IPC

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned

Special Public Prosecutor and perused the entire material available

on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is

already a compromise has arrived at between the parties, which

has been produced in the petition filed under Section 482 CrPC.

(Downloaded on 17/07/2021 at 08:46:28 PM)

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-5593/2021]

In view thereof, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the

petitioners.

Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 438

CrPC is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of

petitioners 1) Mumal w/o Pradeep, 2) Gendhu Kanwar w/o

Badri Dan in the aforesaid FIR No.64/2021 of Police Station

Women (East) Jodhpur, District Jodhpur Metropolitan; they shall

be released on bail by the concerned SHO/Investigating Officer,

provided each of the petitioners furnishes a personal bond in the

sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to

his satisfaction, on the following conditions:

i) That the petitioners shall make themselves
available for interrogation by a police officer, as
and when required;

ii) That the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly
make any inducement, threat or promise to any
person acquainted with the facts of the case, so as
to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the
court or to any police officer;

iii) That the petitioners shall not leave India without
previous permission of the court;

iv) That the petitioners shall not commit any offence
similar to the offence of which they are accused or
suspected.

(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J

113-MMA/-

(Downloaded on 17/07/2021 at 08:46:28 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation