SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Munmun Barua vs Unknown on 7 September, 2018

1

07.09.2018

.

136.
as
(Allowed).

C.R.M. 6157 of 2018

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 09.08.2018 in connection
with Nagrakata P. S. Case No.18 of 2018, dated 02.02.2018
registered for investigation into offences punishable under
Sections 498A/326A/506 of the Indian Penal Code read with
Section 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

In the matter of : Munmun Barua.

… Petitioner.

Mr. Rabi Sankar Chattopadhyay,
Mr. Santanu Maji.

…for the Petitioner.

Mr. Saswata Gopal Mukherjee,
Mr. Biswajit Manna.

…..for the State.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with with

Nagrakata P. S. Case No.18 of 2018, dated 02.02.2018 registered

for investigation into offences punishable under Sections

498A/326A/506 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 3 / 4

of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

The State produces the case diary and refers to the

statements of the neighbours and others involved.

Considering the material on record, there appears to be gross

allegations against the husband. However, considering the extent
2

of the present petitioner’s involvement, there may not be any

impediment to granting her anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, in the event of arrest the petitioner, will be

granted bail upon furnishing security of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten

thousand only), with two sureties Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five

thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, to the

satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to the conditions as

laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

1973. In addition, the petitioner will also report to the

Investigating Officer at such time and place as may be specified by

the concerned police officer.

The petition for anticipatory bail is allowed subject to the

conditions as indicated above.

A certified copy of this order be immediately made available

to the petitioner subject to compliance with all requisite

formalities.

(Abhijit Gangopadhyay,J.) (Sanjib Banerjee, J.)
3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation