SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Nagina vs State on 11 January, 2019

$~20

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Judgment delivered on: 11.01.2019
+ BAIL APPLN. 59/2019
NAGINA ….. Petitioner
versus

STATE ….. Respondent
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner : Mr. Kumar Vikram, Advocate.
For the Respondent : Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the
State with SI Praveen Kumar.

CORAM:-
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
JUDGMENT

11.01.2019
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

Crl.M.A.499/2019 (exemption)

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

BAIL APPLN. 59/2019

1. Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.129/2018 under
Sections 498A/304B/34 IPC, Police Station Ranhola.

2. Issue Notice. Notice accepted by Learned APP for the state.
With consent of parties petition is taken up for disposal.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that by order dated

BAIL APPLN.59/2019 Page 1 of 2
17.12.2018, petitioner was granted liberty to approach the Trial Court
to seek recall of proceedings under
Section 82 Cr.P.C. He points out
that the protection was granted to the petitioner till the disposal of
such application.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the application
has been filed and the same has been fixed for further proceeding on
15.01.2019. He submits that the said application is pending before
the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate and in view of the sections of
IPC involved, the Metropolitan Magistrate is not competent to grant
bail to the petitioner and there is an apprehension that if the
application seeking recall of proceedings under
Section 82 Cr.P.C is
dismissed, the petitioner may be taken in custody.

5. Keeping in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, it is
directed that, in case the application of the petitioner seeking recall of
proceedings under
Section 82 Cr.P.C, is dismissed, the interim
protection granted to the petitioner by order dated 17.12.2018 in Bail
Appln.2984/2018, shall enure to the benefit of the petitioner for a
period of one week thereafter.

6. Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

7. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

JANUARY 11, 2019/st SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

BAIL APPLN.59/2019 Page 2 of 2

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2019 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh