IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE 2017/8TH ASHADHA, 1939
Crl.MC.No. 4315 of 2017 (H)
—————————
IN CC 1098/2015 of ADDL.C.J.M., ERNAKULAM
CRIME NO. 208/2010 OF ERNAKULAM TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION , ERNAKULAM
NAME AND ADDRESSS OF THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED 1:
———————————————-
LAIJU,
AGED 45 YEARS,
S/O RAJARAM,
CHAKKALAKKAL HOUSE, P.C.ROAD, IIIRD AVENUE,
KALOOR P.O., ELAMKULAM VILLAGE, KOCHI-682017.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.M.ABDUL JALEEL (KODUNGALLUR)
SRI.T.V.SHAJI
RESPONDENTS/STATE DE FACTO COMPLAINANT :
——————————————-
1. STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
ERNAKULAM TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION THROUGH
THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
ERNAKULAM-682031.
2. NITHA DAS,
AGED 37 YEARS,
D/O LATE DASAN,
PAREKKATTU HOUSE, B.M.C.P.O., THRIKKAKKARA, KOCHI-682021.
R2 BY ADV. SRI.DINESH MATHEW J.MURICKEN
R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.E.C. BINEESH
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
29-06-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No. 4315 of 2017 (H)
—————————
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)’ EXHIBITS
———————–
ANNEXURE A1 THE TRUE COPY OF CHARGE SHEET IN C.C.174/2012 ON THE
FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT
(ECONOMIC OFFENCES) ERNAKULAM. NOW PENDING AS
C.C.1098/2015 ON THE FILE THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE COURT, ERNAKULAM.
ANNEXURE A2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE MARRIAGE DISSOLUTION AGREEMENT
DATED 13.6.2017 SINGED BY THE PETITIONER AND
RESPONDENT 2.
ANNEXURE A3 AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY RESPONDENT 2.
RESPONDENT(S)’ EXHIBITS: NIL
———————–
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
DST
B. SUDHEENDRAKUMAR,J.
Crl.M.C.No. 4315 of 2017
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Dated this the 29th day of June, 2017
O R D E R
The petitioner is the 1st accused in C.C.
No.1098 of 2015 on the files of the court below. The
offences alleged are the offences punishable under
Sections 498A, 323, 325, 341 and 294(b) read with
Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. Heard.
3. It has been submitted by the learned
counsel for the parties and the learned Public
Prosecutor that the matter has been settled between
the parties. The 2nd respondent, who is the de facto
complainant, filed affidavit stating that the matter
has been settled and hence she has no further
grievance against the petitioner.
4. The above dispute arose out of family
relationship. Therefore, since the matter has been
settled between the parties, I am inclined to quash
Crl.M.C.No. 4315 of 2017
-: 2 :-
Annexure-A1 final report and further proceedings
against the petitioner in C.C.No.1098 of 2015 on the
files of the court below, in exercise of the
inherent power under Section 482 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 to meet the ends of justice
and accordingly, I order so.
In the result, this Crl.M.C. stands allowed.
Sd/-
B. SUDHEENDRAKUMAR
JUDGE
DST
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
