SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Nanuram Saini vs State Iof Rajasthan Through Pp on 20 July, 2018

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 7471/2018

Nanuram Saini S/o Late Shri Bheem Ji Saini B/c Mali , R/o House
No. 22, Sitaram Colony, Ramnagar Sodala, Jaipur Raj.
—-Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan Through P.p.
—-Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Kumar Sharma
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini PP.

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

Judgment / Order

20/07/2018

1. Petitioner has filed this miscellaneous anticipatory bail

application under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2. F.I.R. No. 192/2018 was registered at Police Station Sodala,

Jaipur Metropolitan (South) for offence under Sections 341, 323,

34 of I.P.C.

3. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that initially FIR

was lodged under Section 341, 323, 34 of IPC, the offences were

bailable. Subsequently offence under Section 354 IPC was added

to make it non-bailable.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the anticipatory bail

application.

5. I have considered the contentions.

6. Considering the arguments put forth by counsel for the
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-7471/2018]

petitioner, I deem it proper to allow the anticipatory bail

application.

7. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. The

S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Sodala, Jaipur

Metropolitan (South) in F.I.R. No. 192/2018 is directed that in the

event of arrest of the petitioner he shall be released on bail,

provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-

with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to his

satisfaction on the following conditions :-

(i). that the petitioner shall make himself available for
interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts
to the court or any police officer, and

(iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous

permission of the court.

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

Seema/36

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation