Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Date of decision-23.03.2021
NARENDER SINGH …Petitioner
STATE OF HARYANA …Respondent
CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ BAJAJ
Present: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Saini, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Kanwar Sanjiv Kumar, A.A.G., Haryana.
Mr. Bhisham Kumar Majoka, Advocate for the complainant
MANOJ BAJAJ, J.
This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 438
Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.
Code, 1860 registered at Police Station Women Ballabgarh, District
Faridabad. The petitioner apprehended his arrest at the hands of Police, in
the above FIR.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has invited the attention of
the Court to the order dated 16.12.2020, whereby while issuing notice of
motion to respondent-State, the interim protection was extended to the
petitioners. The said order reads as under:-
This is an application for impleading complainant
wife as respondent No.2 in the main petition.
Learned counsel for applicant-petitioner has invited
the attention of the Court to the order dated 07.12.2020.
He submits that in compliance of the said order, the
complainant wife be impleaded as respondent No.2.
1 of 2
24-03-2021 22:42:54 :::
Notice of the application to respondent-State.
On the asking of the Court, Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar,
DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-
Heard. For the reasons mentioned in the
application, the same is allowed. Mukesh Bala is
impleaded as respondent No.2. Amended memo of parties,
annexed with the application, is taken on record.
Notice of motion for 23.03.2021.
Meanwhile, the petitioner shall join the
investigation and would come present as and when called
for and in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be
admitted to interim bail on his furnishing personal and
surety bonds to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating
Officer. The petitioner shall also abide by the conditions
as specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.”
Learned counsel for the petitioner further contends that in
deference to the said order, the petitioner submitted himself before the
Police and joined the investigation. According to him, the petitioner
cooperated with the Police Authorities during the investigation and
furnished requisite bonds to the satisfaction of the Investigating
Learned State counsel who is assisted by HC Rajesh does not
dispute this fact that the petitioner has joined the investigation and he is not
required for custodial interrogation for the time being.
Considering above, the petition is allowed and the interim bail
granted by this Court vide order dated 16.12.2020 is made absolute.
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes No
Whether Reportable : Yes No
2 of 2
24-03-2021 22:42:54 :::