SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Narpat Singh vs State Of Rajasthan on 5 October, 2018

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 9828/2018

1. Narpat Singh S/o Kheta Ram, Aged About 33 Years,

2. Kanti Lal S/o Kheta Ram, Aged About 36 Years,

3. Kheta Ram S/o Jawahar Singh, Aged About 70 Years,
All B/c Purohit, R/o Kheteshwar Colony, Balotra, Dist.
Barmer. (Lodged In Sub Jail, Balotra)

—-Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

—-Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. MS Rajpurohit
For Respondent(s) : Mr. KV Vyas, PP

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

Judgment / Order

05/10/2018

The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR

No.398/2016 of Police Station Balotra, District Barmer for the

offence punishable under Sections 323, 498A, 406 IPC. They have

preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Counsel for the petitioners submits that the offences are

triable by the Magistrate. The accused-petitioners are in judicial

custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be

concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the

accused-petitioners.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances

of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-9828/2018]

case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused

petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is

allowed and it is directed that petitioners (1) Narpat Singh S/o

Kheta Ram, (2) Kanti Lal S/o Kheta Ram and (3) Kheta Ram S/o

Jawahar Singh shall be released on bail in connection with FIR

No.398/2016 of Police Station Balotra, District Barmer provided

they execute a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two

sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction

of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on

each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so

till the completion of the trial.

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

Ms/-138

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation