SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Neha Sharma vs Tarun Sharma on 16 October, 2018


TA No.459 of 2018
Date of decision: 16.10.2018

Neha Sharma .. Petitioner

Tarun Sharma .. Respondent

Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Harinder Singh Sidhu

Present:- Mr. Abhimanyu Batra, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Mr. Ram Karan Agnihotri, Advocate
for the respondent.

Harinder Singh Sidhu, J.

The petitioner-wife has filed this petition under Section 24 of

the Code of Civil Procedure for transferring the petition under Section 13

of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 titled as “Tarun Sharma Vs. Neha Sharma”

filed by the respondent-husband, pending in the Court of Ld. District Judge,

Jhajjar to a Court of competent jurisdiction at Gurugram.

The marriage of the petitioner was solemnized with the

respondent on 12.12.2015. There is no child from the marriage. It is the

case of the petitioner that soon after the marriage she was thrown out from

the matrimonial home for not bringing the sufficient dowry. Since then the

petitioner is residing with her parents at Gurugram. The petitioner has filed

the following cases, which are pending at Gurugram:-

(i) Petition u/s 125 Cr.P.C. titled as Neha Sharma Vs. Tarun

Sharma for grant of maintenance to the petitioner pending at


(ii) Complaint under the Protection of Women from Domestic

Violence Act, 2005 pending at District Gurugram.

1 of 2
04-11-2018 21:30:19 :::
TA No.459 of 2018 -2-

(iii) FIR No.200 of 2016 u/s 406 and 498A of IPC pending

before Ld. J.M.I.C. Gurugram.

The respondent has filed the petition under Section 13 of the

Hindu Marriage Act, at Jhajjar.

It is stated that the petitioner has no independent source of

income. She is wholly dependent on her parents. It is very difficult for her

to attend the Court proceedings at Jhajjar, which is at a distance of 45 Kms.

from Gurugram. On the other hand, if the petition under Section 13 filed by

the respondent is transferred to Gurugram, the respondent would not suffer

any inconvenience, inasmuch as he is also appearing in three cases at


Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition

is allowed.

The petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

titled as “Tarun Sharma Vs. Neha Sharma” filed by the respondent-

husband, pending in the Court of Ld. District Judge, Jhajjar is withdrawn

from that Court and transferred to Gurugram. The District Judge, Gurugram

may assign it to any competent Court.

(Harinder Singh Sidhu)
16.10.2018 Judge

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No

2 of 2
04-11-2018 21:30:19 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.


Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation