SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Nilendra Pratap Singh And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 15 October, 2019

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. – 73

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. – 36423 of 2019

Applicant :- Nilendra Pratap Singh And Another

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Yogendra Kumar Mishra

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon’ble Om Prakash-VII,J.

The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings of complaint case no. 847 of 2017 under Section 498A IPC, Police Station, Meja, District – Allahabad arising out of summoning order dated 26.4.2017 pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.10, Allahabad. Further prayer has been made to stay the further proceedings of the aforesaid case.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned AGA appearing for the State.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that the complaint was filed on the basis of false facts and also on the basis of malice. It is further submitted that from the version of the complaint as well as statement of witnesses, offence under the aforesaid Section is not made out against the applicants. General allegations have been made in the complaint. The impugned order suffers from illegality and infirmity.

On the other hand, learned AGA has submitted that applicants have been summoned on the basis of the statements recorded under Sections 200 Cr.P.C. and 202 SectionCr.P.C.. The impugned order does not suffer from any illegality or infirmity.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, after perusing the entire record and having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that no case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. The impugned order does not suffer from any infirmity or illegality. The Magistrate dealing with complaint at this stage has to see only prima-facie case and from the material available on record it cannot be said that no prima-facie case is made out against the applicants. Further, to adjudicate/ decide the pleas raised before this Court leading of evidence would be required, which can appropriately be done before the court concerned at the appropriate Stage. Hence, the prayer made in the present application is refused.

In the last, learned counsel has urged that direction for expeditious disposal of bail application of the applicants be given.

Hence, it is observed that in case the applicants surrender before the court below and apply for bail within thirty days from today, the same shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law. For a period of thirty days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants.

It is made clear that no further time shall be allowed to the applicants to surrender before the court concerned.

With the above observations, the application stands disposed of.

Order Date :- 15.10.2019/safi

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation