SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Nitin @ Anil Naranji Thakor vs State Of Gujarat on 5 March, 2019

R/CR.MA/3184/2019 ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 3184 of 2019
With
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 3591 of 2019

NITIN @ ANIL NARANJI THAKOR 2 other(s)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT 1 other(s)

Appearance:
MR. BHAVIK P SHAH(6391) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2,3
for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MS MD MEHTA, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2) for the Respondent(s) No. 1

CORAM: HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI
Date : 05/03/2019
ORAL ORDER

1. Criminal Misc. Application No. 3184 of 2019
is filed, seeking quashment of the FIR being I-C.R.
No. 85/2018, registered with Sabarmati Police
Station, Ahmedabad, under Sections 498A, 294B, 506(1)
and 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2. Criminal Misc. Application No. 3591 of 2019 is
filed, seeking quashment of the FIR being II-C.R. No.
3280/2018, registered with the very police Station
under Sections 294(B), 506(1), and 114 of the IPC and
Sections 3(1)(r) and 2(5-1) of the Scheduled Castes
and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)
Act, 1985.

3. In both the matters, the parties are
present, stating before this Court that, with the
intervention of the elder on both the sides, they
have chosen to settle all their disputes and nothing
remains to be prosecuted.

Page 1 of 2

R/CR.MA/3184/2019 ORDER

4. The relatives on both the sides are also
present.

5. The original complainant, namely Dakshaben
Anil Thakor, in I-C.R. No. 85/2018 is present before
this Court and she has stated that she has chosen to
give back gold ornaments to her in-laws. She also has
received what was given by her parents. She does not
claim permanent alimony and no amount has been given
towards the same. Although, parents on both the
sides insist on they are being aware of the
entitlement of the girl for permanent alimony and
they are also made aware of the same by this Court,
they have chosen not to insist on permanent alimony.

6. Let the IO VERIFY the genuineness of the
compromise and report to this Court, on the next
date. S.O. 12TH MARCH. 2019.

(SONIA GOKANI, J)
UMESH/-

Page 2 of 2

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation