14-appr-405-2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 405 OF 2018
IN
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 425 OF 2018
Nitin Prabhakar Gujar Anr. …Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra Ors. …Respondents
—–
Mr.S.V. Sadavarte for the Applicants.
Mr.A.R.Patil, APP for Respondent No.1-State.
—–
CORAM : MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.
DATE : 15 OCTOBER 2018
P.C.:
1. The learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants,
who are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of respondent No.2 i.e., original
complainant, have challenged the order dated 6 th March 2018 passed by the
learned Jt. Judicial Magistrate First Class, Cantonment Court, Pune thereby
allowing the application of respondent No.2 filed under Section 319 of the Code
of Criminal Procedure for the offence punishable under Section 498A of the
Indian Penal Code. He further submits that respondent No.2 has filed criminal
case and respondent No.3 was prosecuted and charged under Section 498A of the
Indian Penal Code. The applicants were not made accused by the police at that
Trupti 1/2
::: Uploaded on – 17/10/2018 18/10/2018 00:58:17 :::
14-appr-405-2018.doc
time. However, during the trial, the application under Section 319 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure was filed and it was allowed. He further submits that the
warrants are issued against the applicants. Both the applicants are old persons.
The case was registered way back 10 years. He further submits that there is a
delay of 58 days in filing the revision application. He prays that no coercive
action is to be taken against the applicants till service of notice.
2. In view of the above, issue notice to respondent Nos. 2 and 3,
returnable on 10th December, 2018. In the meantime, no coercive action of any
nature is to be taken against the applicants.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
Trupti 2/2
::: Uploaded on – 17/10/2018 18/10/2018 00:58:17 :::