SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Nitin @ Rahul And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 26 July, 2019

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. – 70

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. – 28892 of 2019

Applicant :- Nitin @ Rahul And 2 Others

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Vindeshwari Prasad

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon’ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.

Shri Santosh Kumar Singh, learned Advocate, has filed his appearance on behalf of opposite party No.2, in Court today. The same is taken on record.

Heard Shri Vindeshwari Prasad, learned counsel for the applicants, and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State/opposite party No.1 as also Shri Santosh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 and perused the record with the assistance of learned counsel for the parties.

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants with a prayer to quash the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No.503 of 2019 (SectionState vs. Nitin @ Rahul and others), arising out of impugned charge-sheet dated 3.4.2019 as well as summoning order dated 9.7.2019 in Crime No.38 of 2019 under Sections 498A, Section323, Section504, Section506 IPC 3/4 DP Act, P.S.-Mandi Dhnaura, District-Amroha/JP Nagar, pending in the court of ACJM-III, Amroha.

The learned counsel for the applicants after advancing his arguments at some length, gave up his challenge to the aforesaid impugned charge-sheet as well as summoning order against the applicants and requested to grant some protection, so that applicants may surrender before the court below. The learned counsel for the applicants further stated at the Bar that they are not pressing any other prayer made in this application and prayed that a direction be issued to the courts below to consider and decide the bail application of the applicants expeditiously in accordance with law.

Considering the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicants, it is directed that in case, applicants appear before the concerned court below within 45 days from today and apply for bail, the bail application of the applicants shall be heard and disposed of expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with settled law laid down by the Seven Judges’ decision of this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2005 Criminal Law Journal 755 as well as judgement passed by Hon’ble Apex Court in (2009) 4 Supreme Court Cases, 437 Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.

For the period of 45 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant.

With the above observations, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of.

Order Date :- 26.7.2019

LN Tripathi

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation