SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

No.330 Of 2019) vs In Re: Debu Ruidas & Anr on 14 January, 2020

1

14.01.2020
Sl. No.125
akd
[ALLOWED]
C. R. M. 441 of 2020

In Re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on
13.01.2020 in connection with Garhbeta Police Station Case No. 267 of 2019 dated
08.06.2019 under Sections 498A/323/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. (G.R. Case
No.330 of 2019)

And

In Re: Debu Ruidas Anr.
… … Petitioners
Mr. Pravash Bhattacharya .. Advocate
… … for the petitioners

Mrs. Sukanya Bhattacharya .. Advocate
Ms. Sutapa Banerjee .. Advocate
… … for the State

The petitioners are seeking bail in connection with a case relating to offences

punishable under Sections 498A/323/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner no.1 is in custody for about 65 days and petitioner no.2 is in custody

for about 40 days. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have been falsely

implicated in the instant case.

Mrs. Sukanya Bhattacharya, learned advocate appears on behalf of the State-

respondents.

Having considered the materials on record and bearing in mind the nature of

allegations and in view of the period of detention suffered by the petitioners, we are of the

opinion that further detention of the accused/petitioners is not necessary.

Therefore, the accused/petitioners, namely (1) Debu Ruidas (2) Laxmikanta

Ruidas, be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand

only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the
2

satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Garhbeta, Paschim

Medinipur subject to condition that the said petitioners shall appear before the trial court

on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper

with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

In the event they fail to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause, the

trial court shall be at liberty to cancel their bail automatically without reference to this

court.

The application for bail, thus, stands allowed.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation