CRM 3319 of 2020
(Via Video Conference)
In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure in connection with Salar Police Station Case No. 205/2019
dated 22.11.2019 under Sections 498A/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act, 1961 and added Section 302 of the IPC.
In the matter of : Nurejamal Jamal Sk. Anr.
Mr. Arindam Roy …for the petitioners
Mr. Neguive Ahmed … for the State
The petitioners undertake to affirm and stamp the petition as per the Rules
within 48 hours of resumption of normal functioning of the Court. The petition is
taken up through video conference on the basis of such undertaking.
The petitioners claim to be related to the husband of the victim.
The petitioners say that the husband has already been enlarged on bail
and the charge sheet has been filed.
The memorandum of evidence filed by the State reveals that the husband
of the victim and the present two petitioners may have poured kerosene oil on the
victim and set her on fire. However, since the husband has already obtained bail
and the charge sheet has been filed, there may not be any need to take these
petitioners into custody at this stage.
Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioners will be released on bail
on furnishing security of Rs. 10,000/- each (Rupees Ten Thousand only) and
personal release bond of equivalent amount to the satisfaction of the arresting
The petitioners will also comply with the conditions laid down in Section
438(2) of the Code and ensure their presence in the trial on every date fixed. Any
unexplained absence of the petitioners from the trial would entitle the trial court
to cancel the bail without reference to this court.
CRM 3319 of 2020 is disposed of.
( Sanjib Banerjee , J. )
( Bibek Chaudhuri, J. )