SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Of The Dowry Prohibition Act vs In Re: Ahinul Haque @ Ohinul Haque @ … on 7 November, 2019

1

07.11.19

Sl. No.374
akd
[ALLOWED]
C. R. M. 10205 of 2019

In Re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on
05.11.2019 in connection with Banshihari Police Station Case No. 147 of 2019 dated
11.09.2019 under Sections 498A/Section307/Section34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3/Section4
of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

And

In Re: Ahinul Haque @ Ohinul Haque @ Ainul
… … Petitioner
Mr. Bitasok Banerjee .. Advocate
… … for the petitioner

Mrs. Sukanya Bhattacharyya .. Advocate
Mr. Mirza Firoj Ahmed Begg .. Advocate
… … for the State

The petitioner is seeking bail in connection with a case relating to offences

punishable under Sections 498A/Section307/Section34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3/Section4

of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is in custody for about 55 days

and that there is inordinate delay in lodging the FIR.

Learned Counsel for the State produces the case diary and opposes the prayer

for bail.

Having considered the materials on record and bearing in mind the nature of

allegations in the light of the submission that there is inordinate delay in lodging the FIR

and in view of the period of detention suffered by the petitioner, we are of the opinion that

further detention of the accused/petitioner is not necessary.

Therefore, the accused/petitioner, namely Ahinul Haque @ Ohinul Haque @

Ainul, be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand
2

only), with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction

of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gangarampur at Buniadpur, Dakshin

Dinajpur subject to condition that the said petitioner shall appear before the trial court on

every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with

evidence in any manner whatsoever.

In the event he fails to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause, the

trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail automatically without reference to this court.

The application for bail, thus, stands allowed.

(Manojit Mandal, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation