SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Of The Indian Penal Code vs Allowed In Re : Pradip Adhikary @ … on 24 January, 2020

1

24.01.2020
tkm/ct 28 C.R.M. 902 of 2020
sl no. 122

In Re : An application for bail under section 439 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure filed on 22.1.2020 in connection with Panskura P.S Case No.
535 of 2019 dated 12.11.2019 under sections 498A/323/307/506/34
of the Indian Penal Code
And
Allowed In Re : Pradip Adhikary @ Santanu @ Shantanu
…… petitioner

Mr. A K Samanta
…… for the petitioner
Ms. Sutapa Banerjee
Ms. Sukanya Bhattacharya
…… for the State
Mr. Sorav Chatterjee
Mr. Kamal Mishra
…… for the de facto complainant

Heard the learned advocates appearing for the petitioner

and the State.

Having considered the materials on record and bearing in

mind that nature of allegations in the light of the submission that

he has been falsely implicated in the instant case, we are of the

opinion further detention of the petitioner is not necessary,

however his movement requires to be restricted in order to instill

confidence in the mind of the de facto complainant and to

prevent commission of similar offence.

Accordingly, the petitioner be released on bail upon

furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like

amount each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the

learned CJM, Purba Medinipur on condition that the petitioner
2

shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing and

shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any

manner whatsoever and on further condition that the petitioner

shall not enter the jurisdiction of Panskura P.S until further

orders except for purpose of investigation and attending court

proceeding and shall provide address where he shall presently

reside to the investigating officer as well as to the court below

and shall report to the officer in charge of the concerned P.S

within whose jurisdiction he shall presently reside once in a week

until further orders.

In the event he fails to appear before the trial court without

justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his

bail automatically without reference to this court.

The application being CRM 902 of 2020 is disposed of.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation