SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Of The Indian Penal Code vs In Re on 24 July, 2018

1

24.7.2018
36

Bail Allowed
md.

CRM No. 5041 of 2018
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 18.7.2018 in connection with
Kumarganj Police Station case No. 169/2017 under Sections 498A/417/34
of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 corresponding to G.R. No. 1064 of 2017 ;

And
In Re:-

Mr. Rejaul Rahaman Mondal
… Petitioner
Mr. Rajdeep Mazumdar
Mr. Pritam Ray, Advocate
Ms. Kriti Mehrotra, Advocate
..for the Petitioner

Mrs. Purnima Ghosh, Advocate
.. for the State
Liberty is given to Advocate for the petitioner to insert the name of

the appropriate police station in the cause title. Such insertion may be

carried out in the presence of an officer of this Court.

The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Kumarganj

Police Station case No. 169/2017 under Sections 498A/417/34 of the Indian

Penal Code, 1860 corresponding to G.R. No. 1064 of 2017.

The State opposes the prayer for bail and produces the case diary.

Though there are allegations of the second wife’s monies being

misappropriated by the petitioner, on a perusal of the case diary, it does not

appear that the petitioner’s arrest will be necessary.

Accordingly, in the event of arrest of the petitioner the petitioner will be

granted bail upon furnishing security of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand

Only) with two sureties of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) each, one

1
2

of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer, subject

to the conditions as laid down in Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973. In addition, the petitioner will also report to the

Investigating Officer at such time and place as may be specified by the

concerned police officer.

The petition for anticipatory bail is allowed on the conditions indicated

above.

A certified copy of this order be immediately made available to the

petitioner subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Abhijit Gangopadhyay, J.) (Sanjib Banerjee, J. )

2

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation